From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422649Ab3LTNv0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Dec 2013 08:51:26 -0500 Received: from mail-ea0-f182.google.com ([209.85.215.182]:50661 "EHLO mail-ea0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932433Ab3LTNvX (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Dec 2013 08:51:23 -0500 Message-ID: <52B44B56.1020903@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:51:18 +0100 From: Juri Lelli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Zijlstra , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, oleg@redhat.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, johan.eker@ericsson.com, p.faure@akatech.ch, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, claudio@evidence.eu.com, michael@amarulasolutions.com, fchecconi@gmail.com, tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it, nicola.manica@disi.unitn.it, luca.abeni@unitn.it, dhaval.giani@gmail.com, hgu1972@gmail.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, raistlin@linux.it, insop.song@gmail.com, liming.wang@windriver.com, jkacur@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] sched, deadline: patches References: <20131217122720.950475833@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20131217122720.950475833@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 12/17/2013 01:27 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Hai.. > > This is my current queue of SCHED_DEADLINE; which I hope to merge 'soon'. > > Juri handed me a version that should've (didn't check) included all feedback > including the new sched_attr interface. > > I did clean up some of the patches; moved some hunks around so that each patch > compiles on its own etc.. > > I then did a number of patches at the end to change some actual stuff around. > > Juri do you have some userspace around to test with? I'm just too likely to > have wrecked everything; so if you don't have something I need to go write > something before merging this :-) > > No need to update your test proglets to the new interface, I can lift it if > that is more convenient -- I know you're conferencing atm. > I use this: https://github.com/gbagnoli/rt-app/tree/new-ABI It is aligned with the new ABI (but it is missing your last changes). > One question; the SoB chain in patch 2/13 seems weird; I suppose that > patch is a collaborative effort? could we cure that by mentioning Fabio > and Michael in some other way? > We could change their SoB to be a Cc (not sure this cure the thing anyway). Not even Cc-ing them seems pointless. Then we have them mentioned in sched/deadline.c copyright (oh! s/2012/2014/ there :-O). Thanks, - Juri