From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753252Ab3LUDFQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Dec 2013 22:05:16 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:45593 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752135Ab3LUDFP (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Dec 2013 22:05:15 -0500 Message-ID: <52B50569.8060909@infradead.org> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 19:05:13 -0800 From: Randy Dunlap User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexis Berlemont , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: perf and Kconfig References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/20/13 16:39, Alexis Berlemont wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a proposal of a small contribution which tries to fulfill the > task "Use Kconfig to allow selecting features and build minimal > version of perf,..." displayed on the todo page of the perf > wiki (https://perf.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Todo). > > I tried to continue the work started by David Ahern > (https://github.com/dsahern/linux.git branch:perf-config). This > version relies on the features detection tests available in > linux/tools/perf/config/feature-checks so as to enable some > configuration options (at least by default). > > This little task is not complete; more Kconfig options should be added > for each perf tool (top, record, report, ...). > > I just wanted to ask whether you consider this proposal as interesting > enough for inclusion and if you are ok with the way it is implemented. > > The code is available here: https://github.com/aberlemont/linux.git > - branch: perf-config. Hi, The correct way to have any code reviewed is to post the code (not a link to it) on the mailing list. thanks, -- ~Randy