From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
<prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>,
<davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com>,
<linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpio: davinci: don't create irq_domain in case of unbanked irqs
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 21:22:24 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52B70AB8.6030503@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1387361272-20861-2-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
On Wednesday 18 December 2013 03:37 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> The system may crash if:
> - there are more then 1 bank
s/then/than
> - unbanked irqs are enabled
> - someone will call gpio_to_irq() for GPIO from bank2 or above
>
> Hence, fix it by not creating irq_domain if unbanked irqs are enabled
> and correct gpio_to_irq_banked() to handle this properly.
>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
>
> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> index 5d163c0..1b33806 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> @@ -351,7 +351,10 @@ static int gpio_to_irq_banked(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
> {
> struct davinci_gpio_controller *d = chip2controller(chip);
>
> - return irq_create_mapping(d->irq_domain, d->chip.base + offset);
> + if (d->irq_domain)
> + return irq_create_mapping(d->irq_domain, d->chip.base + offset);
> + else
> + return -ENXIO;
> }
>
> static int gpio_to_irq_unbanked(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
> @@ -429,7 +432,7 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct davinci_gpio_controller *chips = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> struct davinci_gpio_platform_data *pdata = dev->platform_data;
> struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *g;
> - struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
> + struct irq_domain *irq_domain = NULL;
>
> ngpio = pdata->ngpio;
> res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
> @@ -453,18 +456,20 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
> clk_prepare_enable(clk);
>
> - irq = irq_alloc_descs(-1, 0, ngpio, 0);
> - if (irq < 0) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Couldn't allocate IRQ numbers\n");
> - return irq;
> - }
> + if (!pdata->gpio_unbanked) {
> + irq = irq_alloc_descs(-1, 0, ngpio, 0);
> + if (irq < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Couldn't allocate IRQ numbers\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
The code was correct before moving. Any objections to doing
return irq;
instead?
Thanks,
Sekhar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-22 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-18 10:07 [PATCH v2 0/2] gpio: davinci: reuse for keystone arch Grygorii Strashko
2013-12-18 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] gpio: davinci: don't create irq_domain in case of unbanked irqs Grygorii Strashko
2013-12-21 8:20 ` Prabhakar Lad
2013-12-22 15:52 ` Sekhar Nori [this message]
2013-12-23 13:35 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-12-18 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: davinci: reuse for Keystone SoC Grygorii Strashko
2013-12-21 8:21 ` Prabhakar Lad
2013-12-22 15:35 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-12-22 15:41 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-12-23 13:35 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-12-20 9:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] gpio: davinci: reuse for keystone arch Linus Walleij
2013-12-20 14:36 ` Santosh Shilimkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52B70AB8.6030503@ti.com \
--to=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com \
--cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox