Re: [PATCH 19/21] wireless: slight optimization of addr compare

Ding Tianhong
2013-12-23T14:26:03Z

于 2013/12/23 21:47, Felix Fietkau 写道:
> On 2013-12-23 06:11, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>> Use the recently added and possibly more efficient
>> ether_addr_equal_unaligned to instead of memcmp.
> It looks to me like all of these (including the ones in the other
> similar patches) are in places, where the address data is aligned to at
> least 16 bit. Because of this, using ether_addr_equal instead of
> ether_addr_equal_unaligned would be much better for platforms without
> CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS.
>
> - Felix

Yes, the most of the place should use ether_addr_equal. thanks.

Regards
Ding

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>