From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932158Ab3LWJN3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Dec 2013 04:13:29 -0500 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.66]:43481 "EHLO szxga03-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751190Ab3LWJN1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Dec 2013 04:13:27 -0500 Message-ID: <52B7FE84.4030302@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 17:12:36 +0800 From: Ding Tianhong User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Antonio Quartulli , Joe Perches CC: Marek Lindner , Simon Wunderlich , "David S. Miller" , , Netdev , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/21] batman-adv: slight optimization of addr compare References: <52B7C5C5.2050304@huawei.com> <52B7F853.8050806@meshcoding.com> <1387789163.22671.62.camel@joe-AO722> <52B7FD01.9080006@meshcoding.com> In-Reply-To: <52B7FD01.9080006@meshcoding.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.135.72.199] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2013/12/23 17:06, Antonio Quartulli wrote: > On 23/12/13 09:59, Joe Perches wrote: >> On Mon, 2013-12-23 at 09:46 +0100, Antonio Quartulli wrote: >>> On 23/12/13 06:10, Ding Tianhong wrote: >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>> --- a/net/batman-adv/originator.c >>>> +++ b/net/batman-adv/originator.c >>>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ int batadv_compare_orig(const struct hlist_node *node, const void *data2) >>>> const void *data1 = container_of(node, struct batadv_orig_node, >>>> hash_entry); >>>> >>>> - return (memcmp(data1, data2, ETH_ALEN) == 0 ? 1 : 0); >>>> + return ether_addr_equal_unaligned(data1, data2) ? 1 : 0; >>> >>> ether_addr_equal_unaligned() returns a bool value which is implicitly >>> converted to 1 or 0: there is no need for the ternary if anymore. >> >> Should these use batadv_compare_eth? >> > > That makes sense. > > I was wondering whether we should get rid of batadv_compare_eth() at all > and always use ether_addr_equal_unaligned(). The "unaligned explanation" > is part of the name, so there is no need to use a commented helper anymore. > > However, until that moment it is better to get stuck to > batadv_compare_eth(). > > > Ding, can you also follow Joe's suggestion for this patch please? > > > Thanks, > > Ok