public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
To: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	<prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>,
	<davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com>,
	<linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpio: davinci: don't create irq_domain in case of unbanked irqs
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 15:35:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52B83C2F.7090105@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52B70AB8.6030503@ti.com>

On 12/22/2013 05:52 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 December 2013 03:37 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> The system may crash if:
>> - there are more then 1 bank
>
> s/then/than
>
>> - unbanked irqs are enabled
>> - someone will call gpio_to_irq() for GPIO from bank2 or above
>>
>> Hence, fix it by not creating irq_domain if unbanked irqs are enabled
>> and correct gpio_to_irq_banked() to handle this properly.
>>
>> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c |   34 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
>>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
>> index 5d163c0..1b33806 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
>> @@ -351,7 +351,10 @@ static int gpio_to_irq_banked(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
>>   {
>>   	struct davinci_gpio_controller *d = chip2controller(chip);
>>
>> -	return irq_create_mapping(d->irq_domain, d->chip.base + offset);
>> +	if (d->irq_domain)
>> +		return irq_create_mapping(d->irq_domain, d->chip.base + offset);
>> +	else
>> +		return -ENXIO;
>>   }
>>
>>   static int gpio_to_irq_unbanked(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
>> @@ -429,7 +432,7 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   	struct davinci_gpio_controller *chips = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>   	struct davinci_gpio_platform_data *pdata = dev->platform_data;
>>   	struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *g;
>> -	struct irq_domain	*irq_domain;
>> +	struct irq_domain	*irq_domain = NULL;
>>
>>   	ngpio = pdata->ngpio;
>>   	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
>> @@ -453,18 +456,20 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   	}
>>   	clk_prepare_enable(clk);
>>
>> -	irq = irq_alloc_descs(-1, 0, ngpio, 0);
>> -	if (irq < 0) {
>> -		dev_err(dev, "Couldn't allocate IRQ numbers\n");
>> -		return irq;
>> -	}
>> +	if (!pdata->gpio_unbanked) {
>> +		irq = irq_alloc_descs(-1, 0, ngpio, 0);
>> +		if (irq < 0) {
>> +			dev_err(dev, "Couldn't allocate IRQ numbers\n");
>> +			return -ENODEV;
>
> The code was correct before moving. Any objections to doing
>
> 			return irq;
>
> instead?

This is mistake. I'll update. Thanks

>
> Thanks,
> Sekhar
>


  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-23 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-18 10:07 [PATCH v2 0/2] gpio: davinci: reuse for keystone arch Grygorii Strashko
2013-12-18 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] gpio: davinci: don't create irq_domain in case of unbanked irqs Grygorii Strashko
2013-12-21  8:20   ` Prabhakar Lad
2013-12-22 15:52   ` Sekhar Nori
2013-12-23 13:35     ` Grygorii Strashko [this message]
2013-12-18 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: davinci: reuse for Keystone SoC Grygorii Strashko
2013-12-21  8:21   ` Prabhakar Lad
2013-12-22 15:35   ` Sekhar Nori
2013-12-22 15:41   ` Sekhar Nori
2013-12-23 13:35     ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-12-20  9:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] gpio: davinci: reuse for keystone arch Linus Walleij
2013-12-20 14:36   ` Santosh Shilimkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52B83C2F.7090105@ti.com \
    --to=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
    --cc=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox