From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] perf tools: Introduce struct perf_log
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 09:51:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52BC426D.8020408@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1388036284-32342-5-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>
On 12/26/13, 12:38 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/log.c b/tools/perf/util/log.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3838d49f82de
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/log.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include "util/debug.h"
> +
> +#define LINEMAP_GROW 128
> +
> +struct perf_log perf_log = {
> + .seen_newline = true,
> +};
> +
> +int perf_log_init(void)
Why return int if the rc is not checked? Failure here is not going to
stop the perf command right?
> +{
> + FILE *fp;
> + char name[] = "/tmp/perf-log-XXXXXX";
> + int fd = mkstemp(name);
> +
> + if (fd < 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> + fp = fdopen(fd, "r+");
> + if (fp == NULL) {
> + close(fd);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + perf_log.fp = fp;
Add 'unlink(name);' here to ensure the file is removed regardless of how
perf terminates.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int perf_log_exit(void)
> +{
> + FILE *fp = perf_log.fp;
> + if (fp)
> + fclose(fp);
> +
> + free(perf_log.linemap);
> +
> + perf_log.fp = NULL;
> + perf_log.linemap = NULL;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int grow_linemap(struct perf_log *log)
> +{
> + off_t *newmap;
> + int newsize = log->nr_alloc + LINEMAP_GROW;
> +
> + newmap = realloc(log->linemap, newsize * sizeof(*log->linemap));
> + if (newmap == NULL)
> + return -1;
> +
> + log->nr_alloc = newsize;
> + log->linemap = newmap;
> + return 0;
> +}
What's the point of linemap?
> +
> +static int __add_to_linemap(struct perf_log *log, off_t idx)
> +{
> + if (log->lines == log->nr_alloc)
> + if (grow_linemap(log) < 0)
> + return -1;
> +
> + log->linemap[log->lines++] = idx;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void add_to_linemap(struct perf_log *log, const char *msg, off_t base)
> +{
> + const char *pos;
> +
> + if (strlen(msg) == 0)
> + return;
> +
> + if (log->seen_newline) {
> + if (__add_to_linemap(log, base) < 0)
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if ((pos = strchr(msg, '\n')) != NULL) {
> + log->seen_newline = true;
> + pos++;
> + add_to_linemap(log, pos, base + (pos - msg));
> + } else {
> + log->seen_newline = false;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +void perf_log_add(const char *msg)
> +{
> + FILE *fp = perf_log.fp;
Don't assume every user of libperf calls perf_log_init() or that the
file was actually created. i.e., add 'if (fp == NULL) return;'
> + off_t offset = ftello(fp);
> +
> + add_to_linemap(&perf_log, msg, offset);
> +
> + fwrite(msg, 1, strlen(msg), fp);
And if write fails?
> +}
> +
> +void perf_log_addv(const char *fmt, va_list ap)
> +{
> + char buf[4096];
Add as an optimization add the fp != NULL check here too. Don't need to
do the vsnprintf only to drop it.
> +
> + vsnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), fmt, ap);
> + perf_log_add(buf);
> +}
>
What limits the size of the file - other than the obvious out of space
in /tmp? Allow the file to grow without bounds in case a user wants the
messages seems dangerous.
What about using a circular buffer instead?
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-26 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-26 5:37 [PATCHSET 0/8] perf tools: A couple of TUI improvements (v3) Namhyung Kim
2013-12-26 5:37 ` [PATCH 1/8] perf ui/tui: Protect windows by ui__lock Namhyung Kim
2014-01-12 18:39 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2013-12-26 5:37 ` [PATCH 2/8] perf ui/tui: Split help message for perf top and report Namhyung Kim
2013-12-26 14:05 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-12-26 14:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-01-12 18:39 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2013-12-26 5:37 ` [PATCH 3/8] perf ui/tui: Implement header window Namhyung Kim
2014-01-12 18:39 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Namhyung Kim
2013-12-26 5:38 ` [PATCH 4/8] perf tools: Introduce struct perf_log Namhyung Kim
2013-12-26 14:50 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-01-03 8:23 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-26 14:51 ` David Ahern [this message]
2014-01-03 8:49 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-12-26 5:38 ` [PATCH 5/8] perf tools: Save message when pr_*() was called Namhyung Kim
2013-12-26 5:38 ` [PATCH 6/8] perf ui/tui: Implement log window Namhyung Kim
2013-12-26 5:38 ` [PATCH 7/8] perf ui/tui: Filter messages in " Namhyung Kim
2013-12-26 5:38 ` [PATCH 8/8] perf ui/tui: Remember last log line for filtering Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52BC426D.8020408@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox