From: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
<xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <jonathan.davies@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net-next v2 2/9] xen-netback: Change TX path from grant copy to mapping
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 17:58:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52C1B457.90609@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131217214919.GC32553@phenom.dumpdata.com>
On 17/12/13 21:49, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:48:10PM +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
>> @@ -485,6 +520,22 @@ void xenvif_disconnect(struct xenvif *vif)
>>
>> void xenvif_free(struct xenvif *vif)
>> {
>> + int i, unmap_timeout = 0;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < MAX_PENDING_REQS; ++i) {
>> + if (vif->grant_tx_handle[i] != NETBACK_INVALID_HANDLE) {
>> + i = 0;
>> + unmap_timeout++;
>> + msleep(1000);
>
> You don't want to use schedule() and a wakeup here to allow other threads
> to do their work?
Yep, schedule_timeout() would be nicer indeed
>
>> + if (unmap_timeout > 9 &&
>> + net_ratelimit())
>> + netdev_err(vif->dev,
>> + "Page still granted! Index: %x\n", i);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + free_xenballooned_pages(MAX_PENDING_REQS, vif->mmap_pages);
>
> How about just stashing those pages on a 'I can't free them' list that will
> keep them forever. And if that list gets truly large then switch back to
> grant_copy?
But then what would you answer to the guest? You can't shoot the shared
ring until there is an outstanding slot.
On the other hand, doing a copy would just move the memory leak into the
backend, which could be problematic if a guest figures out how to make a
packet which can get stucked somewhere in the backend.
Zoli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-30 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-12 23:48 [PATCH net-next v2 0/9] xen-netback: TX grant mapping with SKBTX_DEV_ZEROCOPY instead of copy Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-12 23:48 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/9] xen-netback: Introduce TX grant map definitions Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-13 15:31 ` Wei Liu
2013-12-13 18:22 ` Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-13 19:14 ` Wei Liu
2013-12-16 15:21 ` Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-16 17:50 ` Wei Liu
2014-01-07 14:50 ` Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-12 23:48 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/9] xen-netback: Change TX path from grant copy to mapping Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-13 15:36 ` Wei Liu
2013-12-16 15:38 ` Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-16 18:21 ` Wei Liu
2013-12-16 18:57 ` Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-16 19:06 ` Wei Liu
2013-12-17 21:49 ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-30 17:58 ` Zoltan Kiss [this message]
2013-12-12 23:48 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/9] xen-netback: Remove old TX grant copy definitons and fix indentations Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-12 23:48 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/9] xen-netback: Change RX path for mapped SKB fragments Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-12 23:48 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/9] xen-netback: Add stat counters for zerocopy Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-12 23:48 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/9] xen-netback: Handle guests with too many frags Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-13 15:43 ` Wei Liu
2013-12-16 16:10 ` Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-16 18:09 ` Wei Liu
2014-01-07 15:23 ` Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-12 23:48 ` [PATCH net-next v2 7/9] xen-netback: Add stat counters for frag_list skbs Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-12 23:48 ` [PATCH net-next v2 8/9] xen-netback: Timeout packets in RX path Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-13 15:44 ` Wei Liu
2013-12-16 17:16 ` Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-16 19:03 ` Wei Liu
2013-12-12 23:48 ` [PATCH net-next v2 9/9] xen-netback: Aggregate TX unmap operations Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-13 15:44 ` Wei Liu
2013-12-16 16:30 ` Zoltan Kiss
2013-12-16 6:32 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH net-next v2 0/9] xen-netback: TX grant mapping with SKBTX_DEV_ZEROCOPY instead of copy annie li
2013-12-16 16:13 ` Zoltan Kiss
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52C1B457.90609@citrix.com \
--to=zoltan.kiss@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jonathan.davies@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).