From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: halfdog <me@halfdog.net>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Sanitize CPU-state when switching from virtual-8086 mode to other task
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 10:42:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52C31027.2030101@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52C196C3.1040300@halfdog.net>
On 12/30/2013 07:52 AM, halfdog wrote:
>>
>> Still in VirtualBox?
>
> Yes, again: after comparing the results from initrd on real hardware
> with Vbox, I'm getting to understand the timing problem involved and why
> timing in VBox is different: The test program usually OOPSes when
> touching FPU multiple times, otherwise, when terminated before second
> FPU-interacation, it OOPSes on next invocation, stumbling over invalid
> CPU state from prior invocation. With improved code, I can rather
> reliably bring CPU into that state, so that next process invoked and
> touching FPU/MMX-state is OOPSed. Currently searching SUID-binaries and
> running UID=0 daemons, that might show interesting reaction on that
> event, but only on DOS level yet, e.g. after running V2 test program
> once and then connecting via SSH, this currently kills the ssh daemon
> nicely.
>
> It seems that machine lockup occurs when e.g. switch to idle task
> happens at exactly the right moment, which I currently cannot trigger on
> real hardware, but still working on that.
>
I'm still wondering if this is a VirtualBox-specific problem or if it is
something that *could* occur on hardware, or in other virtualization
environments (KVM, Xen HVM, Hy-perV, VMware etc.)
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-31 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-28 22:02 Sanitize CPU-state when switching from virtual-8086 mode to other task halfdog
2013-12-29 2:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-12-29 20:44 ` halfdog
2013-12-30 1:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-12-30 15:52 ` halfdog
2013-12-31 18:42 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2013-12-31 19:21 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-31 22:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-03 23:07 ` Sanitize FPU-state when switching tasks (was sanitize CPU-state when switching from virtual-8086 mode to other task) halfdog
2014-01-08 7:45 ` Sanitize CPU-state " halfdog
2014-01-08 17:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-08 19:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-01-08 21:28 ` halfdog
2014-01-08 22:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-09 22:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-01-10 0:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-10 2:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-10 10:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-01-10 11:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-10 11:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2014-01-10 16:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-12 3:22 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, fpu, amd: Clear exceptions in AMD FXSAVE workaround tip-bot for Linus Torvalds
2014-01-09 22:50 ` Sanitize CPU-state when switching tasks (was sanitize CPU-state when switching from virtual-8086 mode to other task) halfdog
2014-01-09 23:02 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52C31027.2030101@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@halfdog.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).