From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751687AbaABMwu (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jan 2014 07:52:50 -0500 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]:45003 "EHLO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750822AbaABMwt (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jan 2014 07:52:49 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,590,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="87020409" Message-ID: <52C5611D.3020600@citrix.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 12:52:45 +0000 From: David Vrabel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20121215 Iceowl/1.0b1 Icedove/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk CC: Stefano Stabellini , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] allow xenfb initialization for hvm guests References: <20131231145001.GA3349@phenom.dumpdata.com> In-Reply-To: <20131231145001.GA3349@phenom.dumpdata.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.80.2.76] X-DLP: MIA2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 31/12/13 14:50, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 05:53:13PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >> There is no reasons why an HVM guest shouldn't be allowed to use xenfb. >> As a matter of fact ARM guests, HVM from Linux POV, can use xenfb. >> Given that no Xen toolstacks configure a xenfb backend for x86 HVM >> guests, they are not affected. > > Could you reference the upstream git commit that enables this. > > And also CC the maintainers of drivers/video/* > > And lastly lets CC also David and Boris on it. > >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini Acked-by: David Vrabel David