linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@minantech.com>,
	Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@gmail.com>,
	Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>,
	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>,
	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	"cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: intel_pstate divide error with v3.13-rc4-256-gb7000ad
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 12:20:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CA9180.1020106@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4410803.FiVxaMNxvJ@vostro.rjw.lan>

Il 04/01/2014 22:38, Rafael J. Wysocki ha scritto:
> On Saturday, January 04, 2014 07:48:13 PM Gleb Natapov wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 06:38:59PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Il 04/01/2014 15:38, Rafael J. Wysocki ha scritto:
>>>> Well, it's just a sanity check and it makes the problem go away for the reporter.
>>>>
>>>>>> Your patch is welcome but perhaps it should have a WARN_ON too.
>>>> It has been pulled in already, so the WARN_ON() can only be added via a separate
>>>> patch now.  Would you like to prepare that patch?
>>>
>>> Yes, I'll add it together with the CPUID check.  I'll send the patch so
>>> that it can get into 3.14.
>>>
>> CPUID check, while correct, will sweep the problem under the rug. Current
>> Linux logic should detect non working pstate in KVM. We should look into
>> why this is not happening for nested.
> 
> I agree.  It's better not to use CPUID for that in my opinion.

Among hypervisors, RHEL5's Xen is probably one of the oldest in actual
use with new hardware and new kernels, and the CPUID bit has been fixed
in 2011.  Older versions wouldn't run new kernels due to other CPUID
bits not being cleared properly in VMs.

Is there real hardware that has the CPUID bit set and non-working
pstate?  If there's no such real hardware, CPUID is what the SDM says
you should use to detect presence of the APERF/MPERF msrs.

Having extra safety checks is fine on top of what the SDM says, but IMO
they should be WARN_ONs.  Otherwise you are sweeping bugs under the rug
just as much.

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-06 11:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-24 14:36 intel_pstate divide error with v3.13-rc4-256-gb7000ad Josh Boyer
2013-12-24 16:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-12-27 12:24   ` One Thousand Gnomes
2013-12-27 12:47     ` Gleb Natapov
2013-12-27 13:46       ` Josh Boyer
2013-12-27 14:15         ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2013-12-27 14:34           ` Richard W.M. Jones
2013-12-27 16:52           ` Gleb Natapov
2013-12-27 17:01             ` Gleb Natapov
2013-12-27 17:17               ` Richard W.M. Jones
2013-12-27 17:17               ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2013-12-27 21:51                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-29 12:12                   ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2013-12-29 15:04                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-30 14:58                       ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2013-12-31  2:07                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-03 17:30                           ` Dirk Brandewie
2014-01-03 18:04                             ` Gleb Natapov
2014-01-03 20:00                               ` Dirk Brandewie
2014-01-03 22:06                                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-01-06 17:18                                   ` Dirk Brandewie
2014-01-07 16:11                                     ` Gleb Natapov
2014-01-03 22:46                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-04  8:35                                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-01-04 14:38                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-04 17:38                                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-01-04 17:48                                       ` Gleb Natapov
2014-01-04 21:38                                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-06 11:20                                           ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-01-06 11:37                                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-01-06 18:40                                               ` Dirk Brandewie
2013-12-27 14:35   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52CA9180.1020106@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dirk.brandewie@gmail.com \
    --cc=gleb@minantech.com \
    --cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=jwboyer@fedoraproject.org \
    --cc=kchamart@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).