From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"vincent.guittot@linaro.org" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com>,
Chris Redpath <Chris.Redpath@arm.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 8/8] sched: remove scheduler domain naming
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 14:33:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CC1044.9040608@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140107102242.GQ30183@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 07/01/14 10:22, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 06:41:25PM +0000, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> But the MC level cpu mask func ptr is called cpu_coregroup_mask.
>
> Nothing a bit of sed won't cure very quickly indeed :-)
True, but that would mean that if two adjacent levels use the same
cpu_foo_mask function, then their debug name would have to be the same.
AFAICS, sd_parent_degenerate() allows adjacent levels to have the same
cpu mask if the flags are different. Probably not a big deal.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-07 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-13 12:11 [RFC PATCH 0/8] change scheduler domain hierarchy set-up dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-13 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] sched: arch interface for scheduler domain setup dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-13 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] arm: implement " dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-13 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] x86: " dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-13 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] sched: allocate the entire topology array dynamically dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-13 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] sched: introduce common topology level init function dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-20 14:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-06 18:41 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2013-12-13 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] sched: replace for_each_sd_topology with explicit for loop dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-13 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] sched: replace topology level init func ptr with sd_init dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-13 12:11 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] sched: remove scheduler domain naming dietmar.eggemann
2013-12-20 14:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-06 18:41 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-01-07 10:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-07 14:33 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2013-12-20 14:00 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] change scheduler domain hierarchy set-up Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-06 18:40 ` Dietmar Eggemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52CC1044.9040608@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=Chris.Redpath@arm.com \
--cc=Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).