From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753795AbaAHSFw (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 8 Jan 2014 13:05:52 -0500
Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:51054 "EHLO
	devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750987AbaAHSFt (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 8 Jan 2014 13:05:49 -0500
Message-ID: <52CD9366.2090200@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 13:05:26 -0500
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
CC: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: memblock: switch to use NUMA_NO_NODE
References: <20140107022559.GE14055@localhost> <1389198198-31027-1-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com> <52CD8A9A.3010608@ti.com>
In-Reply-To: <52CD8A9A.3010608@ti.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wednesday 08 January 2014 12:27 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 01/08/2014 06:23 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> Update X86 code to use NUMA_NO_NODE instead of MAX_NUMNODES while
>> calling memblock APIs, because memblock API is changed to use NUMA_NO_NODE and
>> will produce warning during boot otherwise.
>>
>> See:
>>   https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/9/898
>>
> [...]
> 
> or, there are other 3 patches from Sergey Senozhatsky, which actually fix the same warnings:
>  https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/6/277 - [PATCH -next] x86 memtest: use NUMA_NO_NODE in do_one_pass()
>  https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/6/280 - [PATCH -next] e820: use NUMA_NO_NODE in memblock_find_dma_reserve()
>  http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1623429 - [PATCH -next] check: use NUMA_NO_NODE in setup_bios_corruption_check()
> 
Either one should be fine though $subject patch would be my personal preference.

Andrew,
This should kill at least 3 known memblock users with MAX_NUMNODES. Feel
free to pick the patch(s) as per your preference.

Regards,
Santosh