From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756369AbaAILPM (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jan 2014 06:15:12 -0500 Received: from devils.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.153]:59689 "EHLO devils.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756267AbaAILO4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jan 2014 06:14:56 -0500 Message-ID: <52CE842B.3080500@ti.com> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:42:43 +0530 From: Sekhar Nori User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wim Van Sebroeck CC: , , , , , , , , , , Santosh Shilimkar , Guenter Roeck , , Ivan Khoronzhuk , Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: davinci: rename platform driver to davinci-wdt References: <1385559113-4354-1-git-send-email-ivan.khoronzhuk@ti.com> <5295FB0E.4070406@ti.com> <52961665.3060309@roeck-us.net> <5296DCD6.3030002@ti.com> <52973E40.4060400@roeck-us.net> <52984CE8.50803@ti.com> <52CE7F3F.1000201@ti.com> <20140109110852.GA4898@spo001.leaseweb.com> In-Reply-To: <20140109110852.GA4898@spo001.leaseweb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 09 January 2014 04:38 PM, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote: > Hi Sekhar, > >> On Friday 29 November 2013 01:44 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >>> Wim, >>> >>> On Thursday 28 November 2013 06:29 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>> On 11/27/2013 10:04 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >>>>> On Wednesday 27 November 2013 09:27 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>>>> On 11/27/2013 06:00 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >>>>>>> On Wednesday 27 November 2013 07:01 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote: >>>>>>>> As we switch to use the watchdog core which permits more than one >>>>>>>> active watchdog in the system, rename platform driver to >>>>>>>> "davinci-wdt" to be identifiable. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Looks good to me. Since bulk of this patch touches mach-davinci, I >>>>>>> would >>>>>>> like to take this through my tree to avoid conflicts with other >>>>>>> mach-davinci patches I accept. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Good idea, and makes sense. >>>>> >>>>> Added to v3.14/soc with your Reviewed-by >>>>> >>>> >>>> You should get an Ack from Wim. >>> >>> Can you please provide your ack? I will add it to the existing commit. >> >> I never received an ack from Wim, but I am going to send this for >> merging through ARM-SoC anyway. I will keep Wim copied on the pull >> request so he knows. > > This has my Ack. No issue with getting this through the ARM-SoC tree but bear in mind that there are allready other davinci pateches in the linux-watchdog-next tree+. Okay. I will add you ack (I just applied my signed tag, grr). I did a test merge of this patch with today's linux-next and see no conflicts. Thanks, Sekhar