From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, stern@rowland.harvard.edu,
JBottomley@parallels.com, bhelgaas@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] kernfs: fix get_active failure handling in kernfs_seq_*()
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:48:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CFFA23.3050300@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1389117590-25705-2-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
On 01/07/2014 12:59 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Sasha, I*think* this chould be the fix for the problem you reported
> with trinity fuzzying. Is the problem reproducible? If so, can you
> please test it with this patch applied?
It didn't reproduce too often in the past. I've been running this patch
and didn't see the issue happening, so it looks good so far.
Thanks,
Sasha
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-10 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-07 17:59 [PATCHSET driver-core-next] kernfs, sysfs, driver-core: implement synchronous self-removal Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 01/12] kernfs: fix get_active failure handling in kernfs_seq_*() Tejun Heo
2014-01-10 13:48 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 02/12] kernfs: replace kernfs_node->u.completion with kernfs_root->deactivate_waitq Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 03/12] kernfs: restructure removal path to fix possible premature return Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 04/12] kernfs: invoke kernfs_unmap_bin_file() directly from kernfs_deactivate() Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 05/12] kernfs: remove kernfs_addrm_cxt Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 06/12] kernfs: remove KERNFS_ACTIVE_REF and add kernfs_lockdep() Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 07/12] kernfs: remove KERNFS_REMOVED Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 08/12] kernfs, sysfs, driver-core: implement kernfs_remove_self() and its wrappers Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 18:36 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 09/12] pci: use device_remove_file_self() instead of device_schedule_callback() Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 10/12] scsi: " Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 11/12] s390: " Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 17:59 ` [PATCH 12/12] remove-unused-callback-mechanism Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 18:04 ` [PATCH REPOST 12/12] sysfs, driver-core: remove unused {sysfs|device}_schedule_callback_owner() Tejun Heo
2014-01-07 21:41 ` [PATCHSET driver-core-next] kernfs, sysfs, driver-core: implement synchronous self-removal Tejun Heo
2014-01-08 1:01 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52CFFA23.3050300@oracle.com \
--to=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox