public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ove Karlsen <mail@ovekarlsen.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: To people sending me replies.
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:22:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D0022D.4020305@ovekarlsen.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADOd_ht0h24CB_3qizxU=wRxzkki9zyeVtjaJmOo6+0wMVZKvg@mail.gmail.com>

There is absolutely no need to send me replies, disagreeing. It is 
completely irrelevant.

See no evil hear no evil, is what some of these repliers seem to follow. 
Completely pathetic and a good example of what kind of fantasyworld the 
linux-environment is. A fantasyworld where such response are deemed 
relevant, rather than acceptance of completely CLEAR facts and highly 
questionable morality. As backward as the whole movement, and the level 
of intelligence in this is feeble. My experienced in this field, can 
only for any sensible person mean, to leave all involvement with Linux.

I updated my post: 
http://ovekarlsen.com/Blog/turning-ubuntu-12-04-into-a-low-jitter-os/

The abuse and lack of rationality, can only be blamed for this. And 
these posess no higher intelligence, as is only a myth about 
linux-circles, and indeed many people here are instead blocking 
intelligent development. As any facist construct.

"A few years after I first did this low-jitter config, John Carmack said 
Doom 3 was still taxing on current systems, and struggled to keep up 60 
fps.. Doom 3, which is a jitter-sensitive game, since it does 3 passes 
pr. frame with openGL , will also play perfectly, and with accurate 
timing, on the same machine with a Nvidia GTX 280 at 72fps (72fps x 3 = 
216fps)."

What are you waiting for? Are you waiting for the fairie-hand of Linus 
to approve, lest abuse? Lest keep up appearances that this has not 
happened, you needed someone to tighten things up, and maybe your fanboy 
is not as good as the myth would say? Most replies do not even consider 
the facts here. The pure and technical true and valid facts. Which 
supposedly the list is all about. Instead censor, and abuse, and 
completely irrational posting from far away in LSD-cult fantasyland.

"Linux lacks a professional environment though, something one notices 
quite fast. There is a lot of smaller apps on it, and more or less 
obscure software, but it does not seem to have any mainstream adoption, 
or things one has come to expect from mainstream OSs. In the audio 
environment, I felt much like it was stuck in a time of soundblasters, 
but the ideologically driven linux-environment seems blind to this. But 
it was fun playing “Doom 3″, and Linux-based steam consoles are now 
being made.

And this belongs in this article: I do not agree with the ideology in 
Linux-circles, and would really prefer a commercial OS, that is general, 
and low-jitter. Unix is ofcourse really outdated, and purely from a 
technical point of view, I do not at all disagree with microkernels 
though, it depends on how one implements them. Or hybrid, but reducing 
the amount of work on the engineer, and patchmanagement, and 
implementing the most efficient version of that, seems sensible to me. 
And keep in mind that even a 1mhz C64 could do low-jitter low latency 
audio/video. And TRON-OS people talked about 200uS latency in the same 
decade. Systems that fail to do this, is simply due to paradigm. And I 
ofcourse disagree with Stallman-idolatry, slaving away for some 
LSD-fantasy ideology, lustcultivation and abusive idolaters, semantic 
games or similar social retardation anywhere. And is neither a windows 
fanboy, or mac, or unix/linux, but see these systems from a general 
viewpoint, and that they move data around.

Peace Be With You.

Note: A good example of poor patch management is Phoronix testing, and 
Linus acting, to remove many patches. Phoronix does not understand what 
jitter is, and so in his tests, that is not even considered. This is 
simply random behaviour. 1000hz in the kernel is completely against low 
jitter aswell, and there is a 10ms filter in fair.c that seems quite 
random aswell. When I asked some known people in linux-circles about 
low-jitter, they did not know what would give the least, and would make 
wrong assumptions here. Again random. Nobody in the audio-environment 
understood the level of my audio-dsp either. Coupling this to abusive 
behaviour, and even censorship of criticism of Stallman, makes a very 
odd mythologically and ideologically driven slavery, with what is 
probably a LSD-hippie in Stallman, as founder of ideology, and with 
unix-kernel teachings root in Tanenbaum, another hallucinogen-user. 
(Mushroom picture on Operating Systems: Design and Implementation). With 
Linux mainstream use on gaming-boxes, Valve another faction of 
hallucinogen-use, has hallucinogenic art is in many of their games. 
“Half-Life” really meaning this regressed animal-state, of animal-idols 
and animal-behaviour. The facists in these games, really idols, such as 
the suitcase man, etc. Shuttleworth is also known for his lusttalk, in 
conflict with any decent intelligent man, has said that he wanted 
“ultrasmooth graphics”, but I did not get any response when sending this 
kernel, and info to him, that realizes this. Ubuntu still comes with a 
high-jitter kernel. Instead he later initiated “Mir”, which again seems 
like more of the same randomness. With many contributors to Ubuntu 
ofcourse, doing this purely for ideological reasons, and get nothing, 
other than the abusive random environment."

That is my final word in that. Linux - just another ideologically driven 
myth, as many. If engineers here had some sense, they would make a 
completely general low-jitter commercial OS instead, with considerations 
to minimal-abuse for the pre-installed components.

After all Linux is only in 2013, where for instance, TRON OS was in the 
80s. Ideological bizarre idiocy, with central people using 
hallucinogens. Obviously in fantasyland. One could aswell skip back to 
TRON OS, and continue there, and it would be just as much "progress".

Peace Be With You.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-01-10 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-23 20:12 Richard Stallman: Why “GNU’S Not Linux” and Why We Should “Say LiGNUx” / Stopping abusive behaviour Ove Karlsen
2014-01-07 19:44 ` Liam Lindholm
2014-01-07 20:52   ` Richard Dunn
2014-01-07 20:53     ` Ove Karlsen
2014-01-07 21:13     ` Ove Karlsen
2014-01-07 21:24     ` Ove Karlsen
2014-01-07 22:19     ` Ove Karlsen
2014-01-10 14:22     ` Ove Karlsen [this message]
2014-01-10 15:19     ` Linus - Firebreathing dragon idol of Linux: The Lost Computer Idealism Ove Karlsen
2014-01-09 16:43 ` IO Ove Karlsen
2014-01-09 20:21 ` Andrew Tanenbaum Ove Karlsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52D0022D.4020305@ovekarlsen.com \
    --to=mail@ovekarlsen.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox