From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Joseph Schuchart <joseph.schuchart@tu-dresden.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
thomas.ilsche@tu-dresden.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Perf: Correct Assumptions about Sample Timestamps in Passes
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 08:46:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D2B8F2.7000601@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140109151955.GA9866@localhost.localdomain>
On 1/9/14, 8:19 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 02:48:37PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
>> The existing code does not work. Your unstable tsc patch did not
>> work. I have not tried Joseph's patch. Are you proposing that one or
>> do you have something else in mind?
>
> I think we should integrate Joseph's patch (or mine, or some mixup, I mean
> they do about the same IIRC) as it solves known and understood bugs in any case.
>
> Then we need to check what is the real issue in your case.
>
>>
>>> Now there is still the problem of:
>>>
>>> 1) local timestamps not moving forward (could it happen when events happen in storm,
>>> when they overflow multiple times in once for example, and clock is not granular
>>> enough?)
>>
>> Even at 650k events/sec I am not seeing this problem.
>
> Yeah it happens mostly when a single event, supposed to overflow on period of 1, trigger
> with a higher period. This is the case of sched stat runtime tracepoints for example
> because it is a weighted tracepoint (see perf_count). So it demux into gazillions of
> events all having very close timestamps. But normal tracepoints shouldn't have this problem.
>
>>
>>> Anyway this should be solved with the patch that takes the earliest last event on all
>>> CPU buffer instead of the maximum of a round as a barrier.
>>>
>>> 2) local timestamps not monotonic due to interrupting events. This could be fixed
>>> in the kernel with moving perf_clock() snapshot in perf_output_sample().
>>>
>>
>> For perf-kvm the events are all tracepoints, so there should not be
>> a problem of overlap due to interruption.
>
> Nope, I'm curious what kind of issue happens with kvm events. Could you send me a perf.data
> that has this ordering problem?
There's no data file in this case; it's perf kvm stat live. For this use
case the flush code in session.c causes the 'timestamp below last flush
error' really quick. That's what led me down the road of tweaking the
flush time in builtin-kvm.c. With the existing tweaks perf-kvm-stat-live
runs for a lot longer between timeslice failures. With my perf_clock
based flush time I have yet to the 'Timestamp below last timeslice
flush' error.
David
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-12 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-14 8:07 [PATCH] Perf: Correct Assumptions about Sample Timestamps in Passes Joseph Schuchart
2013-11-14 8:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-14 8:59 ` Joseph Schuchart
2013-11-14 10:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-14 14:26 ` David Ahern
2013-11-14 14:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-14 15:02 ` David Ahern
2013-11-14 15:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-21 14:55 ` Joseph Schuchart
2013-11-27 13:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-20 12:27 ` Joseph Schuchart
2013-12-20 17:09 ` David Ahern
2013-12-23 13:10 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-23 14:44 ` David Ahern
2013-12-26 15:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-12-26 15:24 ` David Ahern
2013-12-26 15:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-01-01 18:37 ` David Ahern
2014-01-03 22:07 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-01-03 22:45 ` David Ahern
2014-01-04 15:05 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-01-08 21:48 ` David Ahern
2014-01-09 15:19 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-01-12 15:46 ` David Ahern [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52D2B8F2.7000601@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=joseph.schuchart@tu-dresden.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=thomas.ilsche@tu-dresden.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).