From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>, <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
<boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen-blkfront: remove type check from blkfront_setup_discard
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 13:45:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D3EE14.3080609@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52D3F535020000780011311B@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 13/01/14 13:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 13.01.14 at 14:00, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 12:34 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 13.01.14 at 13:01, Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jan 13, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You can't do this in one go - the first two and the last one may be
>>>>> set independently (and are independent in their meaning), and
>>>>> hence need to be queried independently (xenbus_gather() fails
>>>>> on the first absent value).
>>>>
>>>> Yes, thats the purpose. Since the properties are required its an all or
>>>> nothing thing. If they are truly optional then blkif.h should be updated
>>>> to say that.
>>>
>>> They _are_ optional.
>>
>> But is it true that either they are all present or they are all absent?
>
> No, it's not. discard-secure is independent of the other two (but
> those other two are tied together).
Can we have a patch to blkif.h that clarifies this?
e.g.,
feature-discard
...
discard-granularity and discard-offset must also be present if
feature-discard is enabled
discard-secure may also be present if feature-discard is enabled.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-13 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-13 10:14 [PATCH v2] xen-blkfront: remove type check from blkfront_setup_discard Olaf Hering
2014-01-13 11:24 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2014-01-13 12:01 ` Olaf Hering
2014-01-13 12:34 ` Jan Beulich
2014-01-13 12:40 ` Olaf Hering
2014-01-13 13:00 ` Ian Campbell
2014-01-13 13:16 ` Jan Beulich
2014-01-13 13:34 ` Ian Campbell
2014-01-13 13:45 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2014-01-13 13:58 ` Jan Beulich
2014-01-13 15:57 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-01-14 14:53 ` Olaf Hering
2014-01-14 15:17 ` David Vrabel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52D3EE14.3080609@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olaf@aepfle.de \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox