From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Cc: konrad.wilk@oracle.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, david.vrabel@citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-blkfront: remove type check from blkfront_setup_discard
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 21:11:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D49CD5.20805@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140113230740.GA23544@aepfle.de>
On 01/13/2014 06:07 PM, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
>> On 01/13/2014 04:30 AM, Olaf Hering wrote:
>>>> Similarly, if xenbug_gather("discard-secure") fails, I think the code will
>>>> assume that secure discard has not been requested. I don't know what
>>>> security implications this will have but it sounds bad to me.
>>> There are no security implications, if the backend does not advertise it
>>> then its not present.
>> Right. But my questions was what if the backend does advertise it and wants
>> the frontent to use it but xenbus_gather() in the frontend fails. Do we want
>> to silently continue without discard-secure? Is this safe?
> The frontend can not know that the backend advertised discard-secure
> because the frontend just failed to read the property which indicates
> discard-secure should be enabled.
And is it OK for the frontend not to know about this?
I don't understand what the use model for this feature is. Is it just
that the backend advertises its capability and it's up to the frontend
to use it or not -or- is it that the user/admin created the storage with
expectations that it will be used in "secure" manner.
I think if it's the former then losing information about storage
features is OK but if it's the latter then I am not so sure.
Or perhaps it's neither of these two and I am completely missing the
point of this feature.
-boris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-14 2:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-10 16:28 [PATCH] xen-blkfront: remove type check from blkfront_setup_discard Olaf Hering
2014-01-10 18:07 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-01-10 21:37 ` Olaf Hering
2014-01-10 22:28 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-01-10 22:49 ` [Xen-devel] " Olaf Hering
2014-01-10 22:57 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-01-13 9:30 ` Olaf Hering
2014-01-13 14:51 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-01-13 16:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-01-13 23:07 ` Olaf Hering
2014-01-14 2:11 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2014-01-14 10:46 ` David Vrabel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52D49CD5.20805@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olaf@aepfle.de \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).