From: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] zram: do not pass rw argument to __zram_make_request()
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:27:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D52D30.6040508@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140114111311.GD2180@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>
On 01/14/2014 12:13 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (01/14/14 12:02), Jerome Marchand wrote:
>>> static int zram_bvec_rw(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
>>> - int offset, struct bio *bio, int rw)
>>> + int offset, struct bio *bio)
>>> {
>>> int ret;
>>> + int rw = bio_data_dir(bio);
>>>
>>> - if (rw == READ)
>>> + if (rw == READA)
>>> + rw = READ;
>>
>> This could never happen: bio_data_dir() can only return READ or WRITE.
>>
>
> thanks. my bad. will replace with bio_rw().
There is no point in doing that. In read-ahead case, bio_data_dir()
already returns READ. Since we don't do anything special in read-ahead
case, just keep bio_data_dir() and drop this test.
>
> -ss
>
>> Jerome
>>
>>> +
>>> + if (rw == READ) {
>>> + atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.num_reads);
>>> ret = zram_bvec_read(zram, bvec, index, offset, bio);
>>> - else
>>> + } else {
>>> + atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.num_writes);
>>> ret = zram_bvec_write(zram, bvec, index, offset);
>>> + }
>>>
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>> @@ -670,22 +677,13 @@ out:
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static void __zram_make_request(struct zram *zram, struct bio *bio, int rw)
>>> +static void __zram_make_request(struct zram *zram, struct bio *bio)
>>> {
>>> int offset;
>>> u32 index;
>>> struct bio_vec bvec;
>>> struct bvec_iter iter;
>>>
>>> - switch (rw) {
>>> - case READ:
>>> - atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.num_reads);
>>> - break;
>>> - case WRITE:
>>> - atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.num_writes);
>>> - break;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> index = bio->bi_iter.bi_sector >> SECTORS_PER_PAGE_SHIFT;
>>> offset = (bio->bi_iter.bi_sector &
>>> (SECTORS_PER_PAGE - 1)) << SECTOR_SHIFT;
>>> @@ -704,16 +702,15 @@ static void __zram_make_request(struct zram *zram, struct bio *bio, int rw)
>>> bv.bv_len = max_transfer_size;
>>> bv.bv_offset = bvec.bv_offset;
>>>
>>> - if (zram_bvec_rw(zram, &bv, index, offset, bio, rw) < 0)
>>> + if (zram_bvec_rw(zram, &bv, index, offset, bio) < 0)
>>> goto out;
>>>
>>> bv.bv_len = bvec.bv_len - max_transfer_size;
>>> bv.bv_offset += max_transfer_size;
>>> - if (zram_bvec_rw(zram, &bv, index+1, 0, bio, rw) < 0)
>>> + if (zram_bvec_rw(zram, &bv, index + 1, 0, bio) < 0)
>>> goto out;
>>> } else
>>> - if (zram_bvec_rw(zram, &bvec, index, offset, bio, rw)
>>> - < 0)
>>> + if (zram_bvec_rw(zram, &bvec, index, offset, bio) < 0)
>>> goto out;
>>>
>>> update_position(&index, &offset, &bvec);
>>> @@ -743,7 +740,7 @@ static void zram_make_request(struct request_queue *queue, struct bio *bio)
>>> goto error;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - __zram_make_request(zram, bio, bio_data_dir(bio));
>>> + __zram_make_request(zram, bio);
>>> up_read(&zram->init_lock);
>>>
>>> return;
>>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-14 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-14 9:37 [PATCH 0/3] zram stats rework and code cleanup Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 9:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] zram: drop `init_done' struct zram member Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 11:03 ` Jerome Marchand
2014-01-15 1:52 ` Minchan Kim
2014-01-14 9:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] zram: do not pass rw argument to __zram_make_request() Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 11:02 ` Jerome Marchand
2014-01-14 11:13 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 12:27 ` Jerome Marchand [this message]
2014-01-14 11:27 ` [PATCHv2 " Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-15 2:10 ` Minchan Kim
2014-01-14 9:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] zram: rework reported to end-user zram statistics Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 10:38 ` Jerome Marchand
2014-01-14 10:57 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 12:15 ` Jerome Marchand
2014-01-14 12:30 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 11:10 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 13:43 ` Jerome Marchand
2014-01-14 13:53 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 14:02 ` Jerome Marchand
2014-01-14 14:09 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 14:20 ` Jerome Marchand
2014-01-15 4:24 ` Minchan Kim
2014-01-15 9:10 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 9:42 ` [PATCH 0/3] zram stats rework and code cleanup Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52D52D30.6040508@redhat.com \
--to=jmarchan@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).