linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] zram: rework reported to end-user zram statistics
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:43:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D53F11.3090005@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140114111012.GC2180@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>

On 01/14/2014 12:10 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (01/14/14 11:38), Jerome Marchand wrote:
>> On 01/14/2014 10:37 AM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
>>> 1) Introduce ZRAM_ATTR_RO macro to generate zram atomic64_t stats
>>> `show' functions and reduce code duplication.
>>>
>>> 2) Account and report back to user numbers of failed READ and WRITE
>>> operations.
>>>
>>> 3) Remove `good' and `bad' compressed sub-requests stats. RW request may
>>> cause a number of RW sub-requests. zram used to account `good' compressed
>>> sub-queries (with compressed size less than 50% of original size), `bad'
>>> compressed sub-queries (with compressed size greater that 75% of original
>>> size), leaving sub-requests with compression size between 50% and 75% of
>>> original size not accounted and not reported.
>>
>> That's weird: good/bad_compress are accounted, but it seems to me that
>> they are to never used in any way. If so, there is indeed no reason to
>> keep them.
>>
>>
>>> Account each sub-request
>>> compression size so we can calculate real device compression ratio.
>>
>> Your patch doesn't change the way pages_stored and compr[essed]_size
>> are accounted. What does your patch change that allow us to calculate
>> the "real" compression ratio?
>>
>>>
>>> 4) reported zram stats:
>>>   - num_writes  -- number of writes
>>>   - num_reads  -- number of reads
>>>   - pages_stored -- number of pages currently stored
>>>   - compressed_size -- compressed size of pages stored
>>
>> Wouldn't it be more practical to report the original and compressed
>> data sizes using the same units as it is currently done?
>>
> 
> hm, do we really need pages_stored stats? what kind of unseful information it
> shows to end user?.. perhaps, it's better to replace it with accounted passed
> bvec->bv_len (as uncompressed_size).
> 

That's really going to complicates things. We would need to keep track
of which sectors of a particular page has been written to. It's much
easier to keep current page granularity and consider any partial I/O
as an whole page I/O.

> 	-ss
> 
>> Jerome
>>
>>>   - pages_zero  -- number of zero filled pages
>>>   - failed_read -- number of failed reads
>>>   - failed_writes -- can happen when memory is too low
>>>   - invalid_io   -- non-page-aligned I/O requests
>>>   - notify_free  -- number of swap slot free notifications
>>>   - memory_used -- zs pool zs_get_total_size_bytes()
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>



  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-14 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-14  9:37 [PATCH 0/3] zram stats rework and code cleanup Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14  9:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] zram: drop `init_done' struct zram member Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 11:03   ` Jerome Marchand
2014-01-15  1:52   ` Minchan Kim
2014-01-14  9:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] zram: do not pass rw argument to __zram_make_request() Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 11:02   ` Jerome Marchand
2014-01-14 11:13     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 12:27       ` Jerome Marchand
2014-01-14 11:27     ` [PATCHv2 " Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-15  2:10       ` Minchan Kim
2014-01-14  9:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] zram: rework reported to end-user zram statistics Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 10:38   ` Jerome Marchand
2014-01-14 10:57     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 12:15       ` Jerome Marchand
2014-01-14 12:30         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 11:10     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 13:43       ` Jerome Marchand [this message]
2014-01-14 13:53         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 14:02           ` Jerome Marchand
2014-01-14 14:09             ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 14:20               ` Jerome Marchand
2014-01-15  4:24   ` Minchan Kim
2014-01-15  9:10     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14  9:42 ` [PATCH 0/3] zram stats rework and code cleanup Sergey Senozhatsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52D53F11.3090005@redhat.com \
    --to=jmarchan@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).