From: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] zram: rework reported to end-user zram statistics
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:02:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D54375.8070706@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140114135355.GC2226@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>
On 01/14/2014 02:53 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (01/14/14 14:43), Jerome Marchand wrote:
> [..]
>>>>
>>>> That's weird: good/bad_compress are accounted, but it seems to me that
>>>> they are to never used in any way. If so, there is indeed no reason to
>>>> keep them.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Account each sub-request
>>>>> compression size so we can calculate real device compression ratio.
>>>>
>>>> Your patch doesn't change the way pages_stored and compr[essed]_size
>>>> are accounted. What does your patch change that allow us to calculate
>>>> the "real" compression ratio?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 4) reported zram stats:
>>>>> - num_writes -- number of writes
>>>>> - num_reads -- number of reads
>>>>> - pages_stored -- number of pages currently stored
>>>>> - compressed_size -- compressed size of pages stored
>>>>
>>>> Wouldn't it be more practical to report the original and compressed
>>>> data sizes using the same units as it is currently done?
>>>>
>>>
>>> hm, do we really need pages_stored stats? what kind of unseful information it
>>> shows to end user?.. perhaps, it's better to replace it with accounted passed
>>> bvec->bv_len (as uncompressed_size).
>>>
>>
>> That's really going to complicates things. We would need to keep track
>> of which sectors of a particular page has been written to. It's much
>> easier to keep current page granularity and consider any partial I/O
>> as an whole page I/O.
>>
>
> fair enough. thank you.
>
> 2/3 and 3/3 were changed according to your comments:
> - 2/3 drop READA check
> - 3/3 update commit message.
>
> ready to re-publish. may I add your ACK to all 3 patches or just to 1/3?
The READA thing was my only concern for 2/3, so yes for this one.
Concerning the third patch, I'd like to see what other people think
about which stats we want to report.
>
> -ss
>
>>>
>>>> Jerome
>>>>
>>>>> - pages_zero -- number of zero filled pages
>>>>> - failed_read -- number of failed reads
>>>>> - failed_writes -- can happen when memory is too low
>>>>> - invalid_io -- non-page-aligned I/O requests
>>>>> - notify_free -- number of swap slot free notifications
>>>>> - memory_used -- zs pool zs_get_total_size_bytes()
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-14 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-14 9:37 [PATCH 0/3] zram stats rework and code cleanup Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 9:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] zram: drop `init_done' struct zram member Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 11:03 ` Jerome Marchand
2014-01-15 1:52 ` Minchan Kim
2014-01-14 9:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] zram: do not pass rw argument to __zram_make_request() Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 11:02 ` Jerome Marchand
2014-01-14 11:13 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 12:27 ` Jerome Marchand
2014-01-14 11:27 ` [PATCHv2 " Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-15 2:10 ` Minchan Kim
2014-01-14 9:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] zram: rework reported to end-user zram statistics Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 10:38 ` Jerome Marchand
2014-01-14 10:57 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 12:15 ` Jerome Marchand
2014-01-14 12:30 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 11:10 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 13:43 ` Jerome Marchand
2014-01-14 13:53 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 14:02 ` Jerome Marchand [this message]
2014-01-14 14:09 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 14:20 ` Jerome Marchand
2014-01-15 4:24 ` Minchan Kim
2014-01-15 9:10 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2014-01-14 9:42 ` [PATCH 0/3] zram stats rework and code cleanup Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52D54375.8070706@redhat.com \
--to=jmarchan@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).