From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752128AbaANWSi (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:18:38 -0500 Received: from www.sr71.net ([198.145.64.142]:54366 "EHLO blackbird.sr71.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751756AbaANWSh (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:18:37 -0500 Message-ID: <52D5B762.3090209@sr71.net> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:17:06 -0800 From: Dave Hansen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Lameter CC: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, penberg@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/9] mm: page->pfmemalloc only used by slab/skb References: <20140114180042.C1C33F78@viggo.jf.intel.com> <20140114180051.0181E467@viggo.jf.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/14/2014 11:49 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, Dave Hansen wrote: >> page->pfmemalloc does not deserve a spot in 'struct page'. It is >> only used transiently _just_ after a page leaves the buddy >> allocator. > > Why would we need to do this if we are removing the cmpxchg_double? Why do we need the patch? 'struct page' is a mess. It's really hard to follow, and the space in the definition is a limited resource. We should not waste that space on such a transient and unimportant value as pfmemalloc.