From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752656AbaAPDHr (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2014 22:07:47 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f50.google.com ([209.85.220.50]:43492 "EHLO mail-pa0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752611AbaAPDHm (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2014 22:07:42 -0500 Message-ID: <52D74CF8.8080202@linaro.org> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:07:36 +0800 From: Alex Shi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fengguang Wu CC: LKML , Peter Zijlstra , lkp@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [sched] 73628fba4: +69% context switches References: <20140111101956.GA11150@localhost> <52D3804A.8060700@linaro.org> <20140116012301.GA2535@localhost> <52D73D9E.8090402@linaro.org> <20140116021811.GA17073@localhost> <52D747E9.9050602@linaro.org> <20140116030142.GA19524@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20140116030142.GA19524@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/16/2014 11:01 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:46:01AM +0800, Alex Shi wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What's about the aim7 shell_rtns_1 and shared throughput? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The throughputs remain the same. We only report changed numbers. >>>>> >>>>> So many interrupt increase doesn't cause any performance change, that >>>>> make more doubt of data correction. >>>>> Could you like to give the typical vmstat output? Specially the >>>>> sys/us/wa/id time percentages. >> >>> wfg@bee /lkp/result/lkp-ne04/micro/aim7/shell_rtns_1/x86_64-lkp/91dd08bd65052b483f96f75abcc93f2f1b67a62c/1% cat vmstat >>> 1389799131.230965 procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- ----cpu---- >>> 1389799131.231067 r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa >>> 1389799143.207206 1912 26 0 10354424 0 851960 0 0 0 0 8849 31376 28 67 6 0 >>> 1389799144.207531 1515 35 0 10318484 0 852092 0 0 0 0 7670 28332 31 69 0 0 >>> 1389799145.207852 1678 26 0 10303276 0 852196 0 0 0 0 7596 27208 31 69 0 0 >>> 1389799146.208176 1981 43 0 10264672 0 852284 0 0 0 0 7478 27313 31 69 0 0 >>> 1389799147.208500 1977 35 0 10299316 0 852380 0 0 0 0 8505 29552 30 70 0 0 >> >> That's for the data! Sorry for typo. I wanted to say 'Thanks for the data' not 'That'. :) This data is good enough. > > It does not matter in comparison POV. How do you know when aim starts > the testing phase? > >> Is it the per seconds or per 10 seconds? > > It's per seconds. The first column has the time stamps. Thanks! > > Thanks, > Fengguang > -- Thanks Alex