public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, chegu_vinod@hp.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] numa,sched: normalize faults_from stats and weigh by CPU use
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 09:51:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D94380.5040901@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140117095459.GF11314@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 01/17/2014 04:54 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:17:36AM -0500, riel@redhat.com wrote:
>> +			/*
>> +			 * Normalize the faults_from, so all tasks in a group
>> +			 * count according to CPU use, instead of by the raw
>> +			 * number of faults. This prevents the situation where
>> +			 * the garbage collector totally dominates the stats,
>> +			 * and the access patterns of the worker threads are
>> +			 * ignored.
>> +			 */
> 
> Instead of focusing on the one example (GC) here, I would suggest
> saying something along the lines of: Tasks with little runtime have
> little over-all impact on throughput and thus their faults are less
> important.

Thanks for the review, I have updated the comment
accordingly.

Does anybody else have comments on this series, or should
I start begging for Acked-by: and Reviewed-by: lines? :)

-- 
All rights reversed

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-17 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-17  6:17 [PATCH 0/6] pseudo-interleaving for automatic NUMA balancing riel
2014-01-17  6:17 ` [PATCH 1/6] numa,sched,mm: remove p->numa_migrate_deferred riel
2014-01-17  6:17 ` [PATCH 2/6] numa,sched: track from which nodes NUMA faults are triggered riel
2014-01-17  6:17 ` [PATCH 3/6] numa,sched: build per numa_group active node mask from faults_from statistics riel
2014-01-17  6:17 ` [PATCH 4/6] numa,sched: tracepoints for NUMA balancing active nodemask changes riel
2014-01-17  6:17 ` [PATCH 5/6] numa,sched,mm: use active_nodes nodemask to limit numa migrations riel
2014-01-17  6:17 ` [PATCH 6/6] numa,sched: normalize faults_from stats and weigh by CPU use riel
2014-01-17  9:54   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-17 14:51     ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2014-01-17 15:04       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-17 18:47         ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52D94380.5040901@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox