From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753923AbaATX2G (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jan 2014 18:28:06 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f53.google.com ([74.125.83.53]:51298 "EHLO mail-ee0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753506AbaATX2E (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jan 2014 18:28:04 -0500 Message-ID: <52DDB0FF.1050300@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:27:59 +0100 From: Branimir Maksimovic User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: Borislav Petkov , Daniel Exner , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Poor network performance x86_64.. also with 3.13 References: <52DAD66F.7080306@dragonslave.de> <20140118195026.GA15543@pd.tnic> <52DB0439.2060905@dragonslave.de> <52DDA2CD.9040001@dragonslave.de> <20140120223752.GA3057@pd.tnic> In-Reply-To: <20140120223752.GA3057@pd.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/20/2014 11:37 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:27:25PM +0100, Daniel Exner wrote: >> I just did the same procedure with Kernel Version 3.13: same poor rates. >> >> I think I will try to see of 3.12.6 was still ok and bisect from there. > Or try something more coarse-grained like 3.11 first, then 3.12 and then > the -rcs in between. > Hm, on my machine 3.13 (latest git) has double throughtput of 3.11 (distro compiled) on loopback interface. 68Gb vs 33Gb (iperf).