From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] Use __kernel_long_t in struct timex
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 09:03:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52DEA84D.2090306@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140121165803.GC20798@arm.com>
On 01/21/2014 08:58 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> BTW, could we not avoid the #if and always use __kernel_long_t? This
> wouldn't break the user ABI.
>
Ah yes, this is the wrong version of the patchset. I already gave that
feedback and H.J. posted an update. My bad.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-21 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-27 17:25 [PATCH 0/8] Update kernel uabi header files for x32 H.J. Lu
2013-12-27 17:25 ` [PATCH 1/8] Use __kernel_long_t in struct timex H.J. Lu
2013-12-27 22:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-21 16:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-21 17:03 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2014-01-21 17:12 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-12-27 17:25 ` [PATCH 2/8] Use __kernel_long_t/__kernel_ulong_t in <linux/resource.h> H.J. Lu
2013-12-27 17:25 ` [PATCH 3/8] Use __kernel_ulong_t in uapi struct ipc64_perm H.J. Lu
2013-12-27 17:25 ` [PATCH 4/8] Use __kernel_long_t in struct msgbuf H.J. Lu
2013-12-27 17:25 ` [PATCH 5/8] Use __kernel_ulong_t in struct msqid64_ds H.J. Lu
2013-12-27 17:25 ` [PATCH 6/8] Use __kernel_ulong_t in x86 struct semid64_ds H.J. Lu
2014-01-21 17:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-21 18:06 ` H.J. Lu
2014-01-22 14:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-01-22 15:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-12-27 17:25 ` [PATCH 7/8] Use __kernel_ulong_t in shmid64_ds/shminfo64/shm_info H.J. Lu
2013-12-27 17:25 ` [PATCH 8/8] Use __kernel_long_t in struct mq_attr H.J. Lu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-12-27 22:14 [PATCH 0/8] Update kernel uabi header files for x32 H.J. Lu
2013-12-27 22:14 ` [PATCH 1/8] Use __kernel_long_t in struct timex H.J. Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52DEA84D.2090306@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox