From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755589AbaAWVtR (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jan 2014 16:49:17 -0500 Received: from smtp.citrix.com ([66.165.176.89]:4260 "EHLO SMTP.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755439AbaAWVtO (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jan 2014 16:49:14 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,708,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="95952738" Message-ID: <52E18E57.8040600@citrix.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 21:49:11 +0000 From: Zoltan Kiss User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Miller CC: , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/9] xen-netback: TX grant mapping with SKBTX_DEV_ZEROCOPY instead of copy References: <1390253069-25507-1-git-send-email-zoltan.kiss@citrix.com> <20140122.175031.873909526743971037.davem@davemloft.net> <52E11563.1090707@citrix.com> <20140123.133948.1912867106975845377.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20140123.133948.1912867106975845377.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.80.2.133] X-DLP: MIA1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 23/01/14 21:39, David Miller wrote: > From: Zoltan Kiss > Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:13:07 +0000 > >> It is already based on two predecessor patches, one which is already >> accepted but not applied yet: >> >> [PATCH net-next v2] xen-netback: Rework rx_work_todo >> >> And the other one is hopefully will be accepted very soon: >> >> [PATCH v5] xen/grant-table: Avoid m2p_override during mapping > > These have both been asked for changes or small adjustments to be made. AFAIK Wei acked the netback one: http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg267800.html I've just sent in the latest one for the grant mapping one > Also, you really have to precisely and explicitly mention any > dependencies which exist. Ok, the grant mapping API dependency is vaguely mentioned in the patch history, I'll move it. I haven't mentioned the other one because it's not related to the grant mapping changes, it's a generic bug. > In fact, it's often best to not post a series until the dependent > patches have been accepted. I've posted the first version of this series in November, these two issues turned up in the recent weeks. Zoli