public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
To: Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>,
	peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, oleg@redhat.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
	darren@dvhart.com, johan.eker@ericsson.com, p.faure@akatech.ch,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, claudio@evidence.eu.com,
	michael@amarulasolutions.com, fchecconi@gmail.com,
	tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it, nicola.manica@disi.unitn.it,
	dhaval.giani@gmail.com, hgu1972@gmail.com,
	paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, raistlin@linux.it,
	insop.song@gmail.com, liming.wang@windriver.com,
	jkacur@redhat.com, harald.gustafsson@ericsson.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, bruce.ashfield@windriver.com,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, rob@landley.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Add sched_dl documentation
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:52:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E6568F.9040802@unitn.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140127124011.GA16809@austad.us>

On 01/27/2014 01:40 PM, Henrik Austad wrote:
[...]
>>> Current runtime: time spent running _this_ period? or is _remaining_
>>> runtime this period? I get the feeling it's the latter.
>>>
>>> So, roughly, it is the ration
>>>
>>>        remaining_runtime / relative_time_to_deadline
>>>
>>> which needs to be greater than the assigned CPU bandwidth, and if so, the
>>> budget should be replensihed?
>>>
>>> Shouldn't there be something about not refilling the budget before a new
>>> period has started?
>> Uh... Maybe the description above can be improved :)
>> Do you think that using "remaining runtime" instead of "current runtime"
>> would help? If yes, I'll make this change.
>
> Yes, in my vocabularly, "remaining" != "current" :), so changing to
> 'remaining runtime' would be nice.
Ok; I'll make this change.


>> Also, I see that some of your questions are answered by some items below...
>
> Yes, but I left the comments to indicate that the order was a bit
> confusing.
>
>> Do you think that changing the order of the items in the presentation would
>> improve the readability? If you suggest a better ordering, I'll try to
>> rewrite the algorithm's description according to it.
>
> Could be, at least the ratio-caclulation was a bit confusing until I'd read
> the entire section.
>
> My preferred order (I've just cut'n'pased from the original email here)
>
> +  - The state of the task is described by a "scheduling deadline", and
> +    a "current runtime". These two parameters are initially set to 0;
BTW, maybe some of the confusion can be avoided by explaining what the
"remaining runtime" is here... Something like:
- The state of the task is described by a "scheduling deadline", and
   a "current runtime" (representing the amount of execution time that
   the task can use before the scheduling deadline). These two parameters
   are initially set to 0;

Can something like this help? If yes, I'll update the document.


[...]
> +  - When a SCHED_DEADLINE task wakes up (becomes ready for execution),
> +    the scheduler checks if
> +
> +                    current runtime                runtime
> +         ---------------------------------- > ----------------
> +         scheduling deadline - current time         period
> +
> +    then, if the scheduling deadline is smaller than the current time, or
> +    this condition is verified, the scheduling deadline and the
> +    current budget are re-initialised as
> +
> +         scheduling deadline = current time + deadline
> +         current runtime = runtime
> +
> +    otherwise, the scheduling deadline and the current runtime are
> +    left unchanged;
> +
>
> Emphasis on -my- preferred order. :)
Ok; let's see what other people think, and then we decide the items'
order.


> Either way, I'm quite happy with this documentation-update, this is just
> nitpick :)
Ok, good.


			Thanks,
				Luca


  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-27 12:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-27 11:20 [PATCH] sched/deadline: Add sched_dl documentation Juri Lelli
2014-01-27 11:23 ` Juri Lelli
2014-01-27 11:53 ` Henrik Austad
2014-01-27 12:30   ` Luca Abeni
2014-01-27 12:40     ` Henrik Austad
2014-01-27 12:52       ` Luca Abeni [this message]
2014-01-27 15:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-27 16:56   ` Luca Abeni
2014-01-27 17:09     ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-27 22:29       ` Luca Abeni
2014-01-28 10:03         ` Juri Lelli
2014-01-28 19:22 ` [tip:sched/numa] " tip-bot for Dario Faggioli
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-01-20 10:40 [PATCH] " Juri Lelli
2014-01-20 11:24 ` Henrik Austad
2014-01-20 11:46   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 14:55     ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-20 12:15   ` Juri Lelli
2014-01-20 13:16     ` Henrik Austad
2014-01-20 13:39       ` Luca Abeni
2014-01-21 10:20         ` Henrik Austad
2014-01-21 11:35           ` Luca Abeni
2014-01-21 12:11             ` Juri Lelli
2014-01-21 12:33             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 12:50               ` Luca Abeni
2014-01-21 13:55                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 14:38                   ` Juri Lelli
2014-01-21 16:28                   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-22 13:03                   ` Luca Abeni
2014-01-22 13:51                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-24 10:08                       ` Tommaso Cucinotta
2014-01-28  9:31                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-28 18:22                           ` Tommaso Cucinotta
2014-01-21 10:21   ` Henrik Austad
2014-01-20 12:25 ` Luca Abeni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52E6568F.9040802@unitn.it \
    --to=luca.abeni@unitn.it \
    --cc=bruce.ashfield@windriver.com \
    --cc=claudio@evidence.eu.com \
    --cc=darren@dvhart.com \
    --cc=dhaval.giani@gmail.com \
    --cc=fchecconi@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=harald.gustafsson@ericsson.com \
    --cc=henrik@austad.us \
    --cc=hgu1972@gmail.com \
    --cc=insop.song@gmail.com \
    --cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=johan.eker@ericsson.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=liming.wang@windriver.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nicola.manica@disi.unitn.it \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=p.faure@akatech.ch \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=raistlin@linux.it \
    --cc=rob@landley.net \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox