From: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
To: Henrik Austad <henrik@austad.us>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>,
peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, oleg@redhat.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
darren@dvhart.com, johan.eker@ericsson.com, p.faure@akatech.ch,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, claudio@evidence.eu.com,
michael@amarulasolutions.com, fchecconi@gmail.com,
tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it, nicola.manica@disi.unitn.it,
dhaval.giani@gmail.com, hgu1972@gmail.com,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, raistlin@linux.it,
insop.song@gmail.com, liming.wang@windriver.com,
jkacur@redhat.com, harald.gustafsson@ericsson.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, bruce.ashfield@windriver.com,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, rob@landley.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Add sched_dl documentation
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:52:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52E6568F.9040802@unitn.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140127124011.GA16809@austad.us>
On 01/27/2014 01:40 PM, Henrik Austad wrote:
[...]
>>> Current runtime: time spent running _this_ period? or is _remaining_
>>> runtime this period? I get the feeling it's the latter.
>>>
>>> So, roughly, it is the ration
>>>
>>> remaining_runtime / relative_time_to_deadline
>>>
>>> which needs to be greater than the assigned CPU bandwidth, and if so, the
>>> budget should be replensihed?
>>>
>>> Shouldn't there be something about not refilling the budget before a new
>>> period has started?
>> Uh... Maybe the description above can be improved :)
>> Do you think that using "remaining runtime" instead of "current runtime"
>> would help? If yes, I'll make this change.
>
> Yes, in my vocabularly, "remaining" != "current" :), so changing to
> 'remaining runtime' would be nice.
Ok; I'll make this change.
>> Also, I see that some of your questions are answered by some items below...
>
> Yes, but I left the comments to indicate that the order was a bit
> confusing.
>
>> Do you think that changing the order of the items in the presentation would
>> improve the readability? If you suggest a better ordering, I'll try to
>> rewrite the algorithm's description according to it.
>
> Could be, at least the ratio-caclulation was a bit confusing until I'd read
> the entire section.
>
> My preferred order (I've just cut'n'pased from the original email here)
>
> + - The state of the task is described by a "scheduling deadline", and
> + a "current runtime". These two parameters are initially set to 0;
BTW, maybe some of the confusion can be avoided by explaining what the
"remaining runtime" is here... Something like:
- The state of the task is described by a "scheduling deadline", and
a "current runtime" (representing the amount of execution time that
the task can use before the scheduling deadline). These two parameters
are initially set to 0;
Can something like this help? If yes, I'll update the document.
[...]
> + - When a SCHED_DEADLINE task wakes up (becomes ready for execution),
> + the scheduler checks if
> +
> + current runtime runtime
> + ---------------------------------- > ----------------
> + scheduling deadline - current time period
> +
> + then, if the scheduling deadline is smaller than the current time, or
> + this condition is verified, the scheduling deadline and the
> + current budget are re-initialised as
> +
> + scheduling deadline = current time + deadline
> + current runtime = runtime
> +
> + otherwise, the scheduling deadline and the current runtime are
> + left unchanged;
> +
>
> Emphasis on -my- preferred order. :)
Ok; let's see what other people think, and then we decide the items'
order.
> Either way, I'm quite happy with this documentation-update, this is just
> nitpick :)
Ok, good.
Thanks,
Luca
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-27 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-27 11:20 [PATCH] sched/deadline: Add sched_dl documentation Juri Lelli
2014-01-27 11:23 ` Juri Lelli
2014-01-27 11:53 ` Henrik Austad
2014-01-27 12:30 ` Luca Abeni
2014-01-27 12:40 ` Henrik Austad
2014-01-27 12:52 ` Luca Abeni [this message]
2014-01-27 15:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-27 16:56 ` Luca Abeni
2014-01-27 17:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-27 22:29 ` Luca Abeni
2014-01-28 10:03 ` Juri Lelli
2014-01-28 19:22 ` [tip:sched/numa] " tip-bot for Dario Faggioli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-01-20 10:40 [PATCH] " Juri Lelli
2014-01-20 11:24 ` Henrik Austad
2014-01-20 11:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 14:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-20 12:15 ` Juri Lelli
2014-01-20 13:16 ` Henrik Austad
2014-01-20 13:39 ` Luca Abeni
2014-01-21 10:20 ` Henrik Austad
2014-01-21 11:35 ` Luca Abeni
2014-01-21 12:11 ` Juri Lelli
2014-01-21 12:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 12:50 ` Luca Abeni
2014-01-21 13:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-21 14:38 ` Juri Lelli
2014-01-21 16:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-01-22 13:03 ` Luca Abeni
2014-01-22 13:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-24 10:08 ` Tommaso Cucinotta
2014-01-28 9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-28 18:22 ` Tommaso Cucinotta
2014-01-21 10:21 ` Henrik Austad
2014-01-20 12:25 ` Luca Abeni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52E6568F.9040802@unitn.it \
--to=luca.abeni@unitn.it \
--cc=bruce.ashfield@windriver.com \
--cc=claudio@evidence.eu.com \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhaval.giani@gmail.com \
--cc=fchecconi@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=harald.gustafsson@ericsson.com \
--cc=henrik@austad.us \
--cc=hgu1972@gmail.com \
--cc=insop.song@gmail.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=johan.eker@ericsson.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=liming.wang@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nicola.manica@disi.unitn.it \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=p.faure@akatech.ch \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox