From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: <balbi@ti.com>
Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
<ivan.khoronzhuk@ti.com>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: keystone: switch to use runtime pm
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:20:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52EBF790.3090407@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140131164534.GL20736@saruman.home>
On Friday 31 January 2014 11:45 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:50:40AM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> On Friday 31 January 2014 10:47 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:43:21AM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>>> On Friday 31 January 2014 10:19 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 03:20:26PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>>>>> The Keystone PM management layer has been implemented using PM bus for
>>>>>> power management clocks. As result, most of Keystone drivers don't need
>>>>>> to manage clocks directly. They just need to enable runtime PM and use it
>>>>>> to handle their PM state and clocks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hence, remove clock management code and switch to use runtime PM.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> quite a few weeks back I sent a series enabling runtime pm for all glue
>>>>> layers. I'll use that version instead, sorry.
>>>>>
>>>> That should be fine but you need to drop clk_*() related code
>>>> from that patch. I assume you will send refresh version of it then.
>>>
>>> why ? it makes no difference if you enable twice and disable twice.
>>>
>> Sure but why do you want to have the clock node handling code in drivers
>> if it is not needed. Isn't that better ?
>
> It might, but then way that I wanted to see it is so that I can make
> assumptions about the device state. From a driver perspective, what I
> would love to see is the ability to assume that when my probe gets
> called the device is already enabled. So if you can make sure that
> clk_enable() happens before my probe and that you call
> pm_runtime_set_active() before my probe too, then I can more than
> hapilly remove clk_* calls from the driver ;-)
>
> either that or maintain the driver like so:
>
> probe()
> {
> ...
>
> clk_get(dev, "fck");
> clk_prepare(clk);
> clk_enable(clk);
> pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
> pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> ...
> }
>
> runtime_suspend()
> {
> clk_disable(dev);
> }
>
> runtime_resume()
> {
> clk_enable(dev);
> }
>
> note that because of pm_runtime_set_active() that first
> pm_runtime_get_sync() in probe() will simply increase the reference
> counter without calling my ->runtime_resume() callback, which is exactly
> what we want, as that would completely avoid situations of bad context
> being restored because of that initial pm_runtime_get_sync().
>
Thanks for making your point bit clear.
> Then, we can even make pm_runtime completely async easily, because
> clk_prepare() was called only on probe() (or before it, for that
> matter).
>
> Bottomline is, if you can guarantee me that clk_get(), clk_prepare(),
> clk_enable() and pm_runtime_set_active() will be called properly before
> my probe, i'll be more than happy to comply with your request above as
> that will greatly simplify my driver.
>
Which is the case at least I see on Keystone. And hence the patch from
Grygorii works. I also noticed your proposal for wider platform to
enforce above behavior which seems to be a good idea.
> Just make, also, that if this clock is shared between dwc3-keystone
> wrapper and dwc3 core, you clk_get() on both driver's probe.
>
I understand. In summary, whichever patch you pick(yours) or Grygorii's,
its completely safe to remove the clock handling from Keystone USB driver.
Regards,
Santosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-31 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-31 13:20 [PATCH] usb: dwc3: keystone: switch to use runtime pm Grygorii Strashko
2014-01-31 14:35 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-01-31 15:19 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-01-31 15:43 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-01-31 15:47 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-01-31 15:50 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-01-31 16:45 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-01-31 19:20 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2014-01-31 22:15 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-01-31 23:04 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-01-31 21:13 ` Alan Stern
2014-01-31 22:11 ` Felipe Balbi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52EBF790.3090407@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=ivan.khoronzhuk@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).