linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: <balbi@ti.com>
Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	<ivan.khoronzhuk@ti.com>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: keystone: switch to use runtime pm
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:20:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52EBF790.3090407@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140131164534.GL20736@saruman.home>

On Friday 31 January 2014 11:45 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:50:40AM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> On Friday 31 January 2014 10:47 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:43:21AM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>>> On Friday 31 January 2014 10:19 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 03:20:26PM +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>>>>> The Keystone PM management layer has been implemented using PM bus for
>>>>>> power management clocks. As result, most of Keystone drivers don't need
>>>>>> to manage clocks directly. They just need to enable runtime PM and use it
>>>>>> to handle their PM state and clocks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hence, remove clock management code and switch to use runtime PM.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> quite a few weeks back I sent a series enabling runtime pm for all glue
>>>>> layers. I'll use that version instead, sorry.
>>>>>
>>>> That should be fine but you need to drop clk_*() related code
>>>> from that patch. I assume you will send refresh version of it then.
>>>
>>> why ? it makes no difference if you enable twice and disable twice.
>>>
>> Sure but why do you want to have the clock node handling code in drivers
>> if it is not needed. Isn't that better ?
> 
> It might, but then way that I wanted to see it is so that I can make
> assumptions about the device state. From a driver perspective, what I
> would love to see is the ability to assume that when my probe gets
> called the device is already enabled. So if you can make sure that
> clk_enable() happens before my probe and that you call
> pm_runtime_set_active() before my probe too, then I can more than
> hapilly remove clk_* calls from the driver ;-)
> 
> either that or maintain the driver like so:
> 
> probe()
> {
> 	...
> 
> 	clk_get(dev, "fck");
> 	clk_prepare(clk);
> 	clk_enable(clk);
> 	pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
> 	pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> 	pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> 	...
> }
> 
> runtime_suspend()
> {
> 	clk_disable(dev);
> }
> 
> runtime_resume()
> {
> 	clk_enable(dev);
> }
> 
> note that because of pm_runtime_set_active() that first
> pm_runtime_get_sync() in probe() will simply increase the reference
> counter without calling my ->runtime_resume() callback, which is exactly
> what we want, as that would completely avoid situations of bad context
> being restored because of that initial pm_runtime_get_sync().
> 
Thanks for making your point bit clear. 

> Then, we can even make pm_runtime completely async easily, because
> clk_prepare() was called only on probe() (or before it, for that
> matter).
> 
> Bottomline is, if you can guarantee me that clk_get(), clk_prepare(),
> clk_enable() and pm_runtime_set_active() will be called properly before
> my probe, i'll be more than happy to comply with your request above as
> that will greatly simplify my driver.
> 
Which is the case at least I see on Keystone. And hence the patch from
Grygorii works. I also noticed your proposal for wider platform to
enforce above behavior which seems to be a good idea.

> Just make, also, that if this clock is shared between dwc3-keystone
> wrapper and dwc3 core, you clk_get() on both driver's probe.
> 
I understand. In summary, whichever patch you pick(yours) or Grygorii's,
its completely safe to remove the clock handling from Keystone USB driver.

Regards,
Santosh

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-31 19:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-31 13:20 [PATCH] usb: dwc3: keystone: switch to use runtime pm Grygorii Strashko
2014-01-31 14:35 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-01-31 15:19 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-01-31 15:43   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-01-31 15:47     ` Felipe Balbi
2014-01-31 15:50       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-01-31 16:45         ` Felipe Balbi
2014-01-31 19:20           ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2014-01-31 22:15             ` Felipe Balbi
2014-01-31 23:04               ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-01-31 21:13           ` Alan Stern
2014-01-31 22:11             ` Felipe Balbi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52EBF790.3090407@ti.com \
    --to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=ivan.khoronzhuk@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).