From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
Cc: ananth@in.ibm.com, anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com,
hskinnemoen@gmail.com, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
egtvedt@samfundet.no,
"yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com" <yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: kprobe: move all *kretprobe* generic implementation to CONFIG_KRETPROBES enabled area
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 16:17:24 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F09404.3060502@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52F077A1.3020701@gmail.com>
(2014/02/04 14:16), Chen Gang wrote:
> When CONFIG_KRETPROBES disabled, all *kretprobe* generic implementation
> are useless, so need move them to CONFIG_KPROBES enabled area.
>
> Now, *kretprobe* generic implementation are all implemented in 2 files:
>
> - in "include/linux/kprobes.h":
>
> move inline kretprobe*() to CONFIG_KPROBES area and dummy outside.
> move some *kprobe() declarations which kretprobe*() call, to front.
> not touch kretprobe_blacklist[] which is architecture's variable.
>
> - in "kernel/kprobes.c":
>
> move all kretprobe* to CONFIG_KPROBES area and dummy outside.
> define kretprobe_flush_task() to let kprobe_flush_task() call.
> define init_kretprobes() to let init_kprobes() call.
>
> The patch passes compiling (get "kernel/kprobes.o" and "kernel/built-
> in.o") under avr32 and x86_64 allmodconfig, and passes building (get
> bzImage and Modpost modules) under x86_64 defconfig.
Thanks for the fix! and I have some comments below.
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/linux/kprobes.h | 58 +++++----
> kernel/kprobes.c | 328 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 2 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 164 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kprobes.h b/include/linux/kprobes.h
> index 925eaf2..c0d1212 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kprobes.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kprobes.h
> @@ -223,10 +223,36 @@ static inline int kprobes_built_in(void)
> return 1;
> }
>
> +int disable_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp);
> +int enable_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp);
> +
> +void dump_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp);
> +
> +extern struct kretprobe_blackpoint kretprobe_blacklist[];
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
> extern void arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
> struct pt_regs *regs);
> extern int arch_trampoline_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
> +static inline void kretprobe_assert(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
> + unsigned long orig_ret_address, unsigned long trampoline_address)
> +{
> + if (!orig_ret_address || (orig_ret_address == trampoline_address)) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR
> + "kretprobe BUG!: Processing kretprobe %p @ %p\n",
> + ri->rp, ri->rp->kp.addr);
> + BUG();
> + }
> +}
> +static inline int disable_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
> +{
> + return disable_kprobe(&rp->kp);
> +}
> +static inline int enable_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
> +{
> + return enable_kprobe(&rp->kp);
> +}
> +
> #else /* CONFIG_KRETPROBES */
> static inline void arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp,
> struct pt_regs *regs)
> @@ -236,19 +262,20 @@ static inline int arch_trampoline_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> -#endif /* CONFIG_KRETPROBES */
> -
> -extern struct kretprobe_blackpoint kretprobe_blacklist[];
> -
> static inline void kretprobe_assert(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
> unsigned long orig_ret_address, unsigned long trampoline_address)
> {
> - if (!orig_ret_address || (orig_ret_address == trampoline_address)) {
> - printk("kretprobe BUG!: Processing kretprobe %p @ %p\n",
> - ri->rp, ri->rp->kp.addr);
> - BUG();
> - }
> }
> +static inline int disable_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +static inline int enable_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
No, these should returns -EINVAL or -ENOSYS, since these are user API.
Anyway, I don't think those inlined functions to be changed, because
most of them are internal functions. If CONFIG_KRETPROBES=n, it just
be ignored.
So, I think you don't need to change kprobes.h.
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_KRETPROBES */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST
> extern int init_test_probes(void);
> @@ -379,11 +406,6 @@ void unregister_kretprobes(struct kretprobe **rps, int num);
> void kprobe_flush_task(struct task_struct *tk);
> void recycle_rp_inst(struct kretprobe_instance *ri, struct hlist_head *head);
>
> -int disable_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp);
> -int enable_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp);
> -
> -void dump_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp);
> -
> #else /* !CONFIG_KPROBES: */
>
> static inline int kprobes_built_in(void)
> @@ -459,14 +481,6 @@ static inline int enable_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp)
> return -ENOSYS;
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_KPROBES */
> -static inline int disable_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
> -{
> - return disable_kprobe(&rp->kp);
> -}
> -static inline int enable_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
> -{
> - return enable_kprobe(&rp->kp);
> -}
> static inline int disable_jprobe(struct jprobe *jp)
> {
> return disable_kprobe(&jp->kp);
> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> index ceeadfc..e305a81 100644
> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
[...]
> @@ -1936,8 +1955,44 @@ static int __kprobes pre_handler_kretprobe(struct kprobe *p,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +void __kprobes recycle_rp_inst(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
> + struct hlist_head *head)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +void __kprobes kretprobe_hash_lock(struct task_struct *tsk,
> + struct hlist_head **head, unsigned long *flags)
> +__acquires(hlist_lock)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +void __kprobes kretprobe_hash_unlock(struct task_struct *tsk,
> + unsigned long *flags)
> +__releases(hlist_lock)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static void __kprobes kretprobe_flush_task(struct task_struct *tk)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static void __init init_kretprobes(void)
> +{
> +}
These should be macros, as I did for optprobe functions
with !CONFIG_OPTPROBES.
Other parts looks good to me!;)
Thank you!
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-04 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-01 12:17 [PATCH] kernel/kprobes.c: move cleanup_rp_inst() to where CONFIG_KRETPROBES enabled Chen Gang
2014-02-02 2:40 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-02-03 11:48 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-03 15:42 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-02-04 2:25 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-04 5:16 ` [PATCH] kernel: kprobe: move all *kretprobe* generic implementation to CONFIG_KRETPROBES enabled area Chen Gang
2014-02-04 7:17 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2014-02-04 11:58 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-04 12:07 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-04 13:29 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-02-04 13:53 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-04 15:39 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-02-05 0:18 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-05 1:21 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-02-05 3:08 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-05 3:36 ` [PATCH] kernel/kprobes.c: move kretprobe implementation to CONFIG_KRETPROBES area Chen Gang
2014-02-05 5:00 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-02-05 5:08 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-05 5:27 ` [PATCH] include/linux/kprobes.h: move all functions to their matched area Chen Gang
2014-02-05 7:51 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-02-05 11:12 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-05 4:57 ` [PATCH] kernel: kprobe: move all *kretprobe* generic implementation to CONFIG_KRETPROBES enabled area Masami Hiramatsu
2014-02-05 5:13 ` Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52F09404.3060502@hitachi.com \
--to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=egtvedt@samfundet.no \
--cc=gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com \
--cc=hskinnemoen@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).