From: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: ananth@in.ibm.com, anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com,
"Håvard Skinnemoen" <hskinnemoen@gmail.com>,
"David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Hans-Christian Egtvedt" <egtvedt@samfundet.no>,
"yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com" <yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: [PATCH] include/linux/kprobes.h: move all functions to their matched area
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 13:27:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F1CBAB.2070106@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52F1C579.1080907@hitachi.com>
For dummy functions, it is not a good idea to still use the input
parameters (not a good idea to assume they are still effect).
- let kprobe* static inline functions in CONFIG_KPROBES, dummy outside.
- let (en/dis)able_jprobe() in CONFIG_KPROBES, dummy outside.
- for kretprobe:
- let kretprobe_assert() only in CONFIG_KRETPROBES (internal use).
- remove kretprobe_inst_table_head() (cannot grep it in kernel wide).
- for (en/dis)able_kretprobe():
if CONFIG_KRETPROBES enabled, they use (en/dis)able_kprobe().
else if CONFIG_KPROBES enabled, return -EINVAL (not registered).
else, return -ENOSYS, just like (en/dis)able_kprobe() have done.
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/kprobes.h | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 92 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/kprobes.h b/include/linux/kprobes.h
index 925eaf2..860313d 100644
--- a/include/linux/kprobes.h
+++ b/include/linux/kprobes.h
@@ -129,30 +129,6 @@ struct kprobe {
*/
#define KPROBE_FLAG_FTRACE 8 /* probe is using ftrace */
-/* Has this kprobe gone ? */
-static inline int kprobe_gone(struct kprobe *p)
-{
- return p->flags & KPROBE_FLAG_GONE;
-}
-
-/* Is this kprobe disabled ? */
-static inline int kprobe_disabled(struct kprobe *p)
-{
- return p->flags & (KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED | KPROBE_FLAG_GONE);
-}
-
-/* Is this kprobe really running optimized path ? */
-static inline int kprobe_optimized(struct kprobe *p)
-{
- return p->flags & KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZED;
-}
-
-/* Is this kprobe uses ftrace ? */
-static inline int kprobe_ftrace(struct kprobe *p)
-{
- return p->flags & KPROBE_FLAG_FTRACE;
-}
-
/*
* Special probe type that uses setjmp-longjmp type tricks to resume
* execution at a specified entry with a matching prototype corresponding
@@ -223,7 +199,42 @@ static inline int kprobes_built_in(void)
return 1;
}
+/* Has this kprobe gone ? */
+static inline int kprobe_gone(struct kprobe *p)
+{
+ return p->flags & KPROBE_FLAG_GONE;
+}
+
+/* Is this kprobe disabled ? */
+static inline int kprobe_disabled(struct kprobe *p)
+{
+ return p->flags & (KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED | KPROBE_FLAG_GONE);
+}
+
+/* Is this kprobe really running optimized path ? */
+static inline int kprobe_optimized(struct kprobe *p)
+{
+ return p->flags & KPROBE_FLAG_OPTIMIZED;
+}
+
+/* Is this kprobe uses ftrace ? */
+static inline int kprobe_ftrace(struct kprobe *p)
+{
+ return p->flags & KPROBE_FLAG_FTRACE;
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
+static inline void kretprobe_assert(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
+ unsigned long orig_ret_address, unsigned long trampoline_address)
+{
+ if (!orig_ret_address || (orig_ret_address == trampoline_address)) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR
+ "kretprobe BUG!: Processing kretprobe %p @ %p\n",
+ ri->rp, ri->rp->kp.addr);
+ BUG();
+ }
+}
+
extern void arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
struct pt_regs *regs);
extern int arch_trampoline_kprobe(struct kprobe *p);
@@ -240,16 +251,6 @@ static inline int arch_trampoline_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
extern struct kretprobe_blackpoint kretprobe_blacklist[];
-static inline void kretprobe_assert(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
- unsigned long orig_ret_address, unsigned long trampoline_address)
-{
- if (!orig_ret_address || (orig_ret_address == trampoline_address)) {
- printk("kretprobe BUG!: Processing kretprobe %p @ %p\n",
- ri->rp, ri->rp->kp.addr);
- BUG();
- }
-}
-
#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST
extern int init_test_probes(void);
#else
@@ -340,7 +341,6 @@ struct kprobe *get_kprobe(void *addr);
void kretprobe_hash_lock(struct task_struct *tsk,
struct hlist_head **head, unsigned long *flags);
void kretprobe_hash_unlock(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *flags);
-struct hlist_head * kretprobe_inst_table_head(struct task_struct *tsk);
/* kprobe_running() will just return the current_kprobe on this CPU */
static inline struct kprobe *kprobe_running(void)
@@ -384,12 +384,60 @@ int enable_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp);
void dump_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp);
+static inline int disable_jprobe(struct jprobe *jp)
+{
+ return disable_kprobe(&jp->kp);
+}
+
+static inline int enable_jprobe(struct jprobe *jp)
+{
+ return enable_kprobe(&jp->kp);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
+static inline int disable_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
+{
+ return disable_kprobe(&rp->kp);
+}
+
+static inline int enable_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
+{
+ return enable_kprobe(&rp->kp);
+}
+
+#else /* CONFIG_KRETPROBES */
+static inline int disable_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
+{
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+static inline int enable_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
+{
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_KRETPROBES */
+
#else /* !CONFIG_KPROBES: */
static inline int kprobes_built_in(void)
{
return 0;
}
+static inline int kprobe_gone(struct kprobe *p)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+static inline int kprobe_disabled(struct kprobe *p)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+static inline int kprobe_optimized(struct kprobe *p)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+static inline int kprobe_ftrace(struct kprobe *p)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
static inline int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
{
return 0;
@@ -458,22 +506,22 @@ static inline int enable_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp)
{
return -ENOSYS;
}
-#endif /* CONFIG_KPROBES */
-static inline int disable_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
+static inline int disable_jprobe(struct jprobe *jp)
{
- return disable_kprobe(&rp->kp);
+ return -ENOSYS;
}
-static inline int enable_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
+static inline int enable_jprobe(struct jprobe *jp)
{
- return enable_kprobe(&rp->kp);
+ return -ENOSYS;
}
-static inline int disable_jprobe(struct jprobe *jp)
+static inline int disable_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
{
- return disable_kprobe(&jp->kp);
+ return -ENOSYS;
}
-static inline int enable_jprobe(struct jprobe *jp)
+static inline int enable_kretprobe(struct kretprobe *rp)
{
- return enable_kprobe(&jp->kp);
+ return -ENOSYS;
}
+#endif /* CONFIG_KPROBES */
#endif /* _LINUX_KPROBES_H */
--
1.7.11.7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-05 5:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-01 12:17 [PATCH] kernel/kprobes.c: move cleanup_rp_inst() to where CONFIG_KRETPROBES enabled Chen Gang
2014-02-02 2:40 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-02-03 11:48 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-03 15:42 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-02-04 2:25 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-04 5:16 ` [PATCH] kernel: kprobe: move all *kretprobe* generic implementation to CONFIG_KRETPROBES enabled area Chen Gang
2014-02-04 7:17 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-02-04 11:58 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-04 12:07 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-04 13:29 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-02-04 13:53 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-04 15:39 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-02-05 0:18 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-05 1:21 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-02-05 3:08 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-05 3:36 ` [PATCH] kernel/kprobes.c: move kretprobe implementation to CONFIG_KRETPROBES area Chen Gang
2014-02-05 5:00 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-02-05 5:08 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-05 5:27 ` Chen Gang [this message]
2014-02-05 7:51 ` [PATCH] include/linux/kprobes.h: move all functions to their matched area Masami Hiramatsu
2014-02-05 11:12 ` Chen Gang
2014-02-05 4:57 ` [PATCH] kernel: kprobe: move all *kretprobe* generic implementation to CONFIG_KRETPROBES enabled area Masami Hiramatsu
2014-02-05 5:13 ` Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52F1CBAB.2070106@gmail.com \
--to=gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=egtvedt@samfundet.no \
--cc=hskinnemoen@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=yrl.pp-manager.tt@hitachi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).