From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757218AbaBFW63 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Feb 2014 17:58:29 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:48423 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757166AbaBFW61 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Feb 2014 17:58:27 -0500 Message-ID: <52F41368.7060801@zytor.com> Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:57:44 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Gleixner CC: David Rientjes , Andi Kleen , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Dave Hansen , Andrey Panin , Linus Torvalds , linux-visws-devel@lists.sf.net Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] x86, apic: Only use default_wait_for_init_deassert References: <87txcc57y2.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com> <52F40F21.8070200@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/06/2014 02:52 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> I would love to see NumaQ, VisWS, Summit and ES7000 just nuked. In >> fact, I'm thinking that unless someone steps up and explicitly claims >> ownership of those platforms by adding their name to MAINTAINERS (or >> reiterating them in the case of VisWS, which MAINTAINERS entry says "for >> 2.6") we should just rip them all out. >> >> Anyone who wants to disagree? > > Anyone who disagrees is automatically appointed to fill in the vacancy > in that section of the maintainers file: > > PALEONTOLOGICAL SYSTEMS > M: vacant@paleontological.systems > S: reanimation > ... and *do the work*, too. Just having a MAINTAINERS entry isn't enough, as we have seen many times in the past. -hpa