From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Preeti Murthy <preeti.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
mingo@kernel.org, alex.shi@linaro.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] sched: Move idle_stamp up to the core
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:07:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52FA1270.9020806@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM4v1pPPOE9xrH3AKc6sHAThPq43Ws_L_KuicRa5Ktr5nMBmtQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/10/2014 11:04 AM, Preeti Murthy wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:40 AM, Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>> The idle_balance modifies the idle_stamp field of the rq, making this
>> information to be shared across core.c and fair.c. As we can know if the
>> cpu is going to idle or not with the previous patch, let's encapsulate the
>> idle_stamp information in core.c by moving it up to the caller. The
>> idle_balance function returns true in case a balancing occured and the cpu
>> won't be idle, false if no balance happened and the cpu is going idle.
>>
>> Cc: mingo@kernel.org
>> Cc: alex.shi@linaro.org
>> Cc: peterz@infradead.org
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>> ---
>> kernel/sched/core.c | 13 +++++++++++--
>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 14 ++++++--------
>> kernel/sched/sched.h | 8 +-------
>> 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> index 16b97dd..428ee4c 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> @@ -2704,8 +2704,17 @@ need_resched:
>>
>> pre_schedule(rq, prev);
>>
>> - if (unlikely(!rq->nr_running))
>> - idle_balance(rq);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> + if (unlikely(!rq->nr_running)) {
>> + /*
>> + * We must set idle_stamp _before_ calling idle_balance(), such
>> + * that we measure the duration of idle_balance() as idle time.
>
> Should not this be "such that we *do not* measure the duration of idle_balance()
> as idle time?"
Actually, the initial code was including the idle balance time
processing in the idle stamp. When I moved the idle stamp in core.c,
idle balance was no longer measured (an unwanted change). That has been
fixed and to prevent that to occur again, we added a comment.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-11 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-06 23:10 [PATCH V2 0/3] sched: idle_balance() cleanup and fix Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-06 23:10 ` [PATCH V2 1/3] sched: Remove cpu parameter for idle_balance() Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-13 7:14 ` Alex Shi
2014-02-06 23:10 ` [PATCH V2 2/3] sched: Fix race in idle_balance() Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-10 9:24 ` Preeti Murthy
2014-02-11 11:11 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-13 7:45 ` Alex Shi
2014-02-13 10:10 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-13 10:22 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-13 7:46 ` Alex Shi
2014-02-06 23:10 ` [PATCH V2 3/3] sched: Move idle_stamp up to the core Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-10 10:04 ` Preeti Murthy
2014-02-11 12:07 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2014-02-13 10:14 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-02-13 7:53 ` Alex Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52FA1270.9020806@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=alex.shi@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=preeti.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox