From: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
To: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Implement compat CPU capability retrieval for KVM on PowerVM
Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 14:55:28 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52c78fd5-e987-4140-bb37-f358fc25c7e6@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260430054906.94431-5-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
On 30/04/26 11:19 am, Amit Machhiwal wrote:
> On POWER systems, the host CPU may run in a compatibility mode (e.g., a
> Power11 processor operating in Power10 compatibility mode). In such
> cases, the effective CPU level exposed to guests differs from the
> physical processor generation.
>
> When running nested KVM guests, QEMU derives the host CPU type using
> mfpvr(), which reflects the physical processor version. This can result
> in a mismatch between the CPU model selected by QEMU and the
> compatibility mode enforced by the host, leading to guest boot failures.
>
> For example, booting a nested guest on a Power11 LPAR configured in
> Power10 compatibility mode fails with:
>
> KVM-NESTEDv2: couldn't set guest wide elements
> [..KVM reg dump..]
>
> This occurs because QEMU selects a CPU model corresponding to the
> physical processor (via mfpvr()), while the host operates in a lower
> compatibility mode. As a result, KVM rejects the requested compatibility
> level during guest initialization.
>
> Add support for retrieving host CPU compatibility capabilities for
> nested guests on PowerVM (PAPR nested API v2). The hypervisor provides
> the effective compatibility levels via the H_GUEST_GET_CAPABILITIES
> hcall, which reflects the processor modes negotiated between the Power
> hypervisor (L0) and the host partition (L1).
>
> On pseries systems, obtain the capability bitmap using
> plpar_guest_get_capabilities() and return it via struct
> kvm_ppc_compat_caps. This information is then exposed to userspace
> through the KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl.
>
> Hook the implementation into the Book3S HV kvmppc_ops so that it can be
> invoked by the generic KVM ioctl handling code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> index 948c6b099a29..d602d90111d1 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c
> @@ -6516,6 +6516,22 @@ static bool kvmppc_hash_v3_possible(void)
> return true;
> }
>
> +
> +static int kvmppc_get_compat_cpu_caps(struct kvm_ppc_compat_caps *host_caps)
> +{
> +
> + unsigned long capabilities = 0;
> + long rc = -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (kvmhv_on_pseries()) {
> + if (kvmhv_is_nestedv2())
If this is only intended for nested APIv2, it should reflect in commit
log/title, otherwise, we need to return success with capabilities set to
0 for non-nestedv2 case.
Also, better to have combined check for pseries and nestedv2 if we are
not handling other cases.
> + rc = plpar_guest_get_capabilities(0, &capabilities);
> + host_caps->compat_capabilities = capabilities;
Do we need to take care of PowerNV case ?
> + }
> +
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> static struct kvmppc_ops kvm_ops_hv = {
> .get_sregs = kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_sregs_hv,
> .set_sregs = kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_sregs_hv,
> @@ -6558,6 +6574,7 @@ static struct kvmppc_ops kvm_ops_hv = {
> .hash_v3_possible = kvmppc_hash_v3_possible,
> .create_vcpu_debugfs = kvmppc_arch_create_vcpu_debugfs_hv,
> .create_vm_debugfs = kvmppc_arch_create_vm_debugfs_hv,
> + .get_compat_cpu_ver = kvmppc_get_compat_cpu_caps,
> };
>
> static int kvm_init_subcore_bitmap(void)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-05 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-30 5:48 [PATCH 0/6] KVM: PPC: Handle CPU compatibility mode for nested guests Amit Machhiwal
2026-04-30 5:49 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Validate arch_compat against host compatibility mode Amit Machhiwal
2026-05-05 6:44 ` Harsh Prateek Bora
2026-04-30 5:49 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: PPC: Introduce KVM_CAP_PPC_COMPAT_CAPS and KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS Amit Machhiwal
2026-05-05 8:31 ` Harsh Prateek Bora
2026-04-30 5:49 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: PPC: Wire up KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl Amit Machhiwal
2026-05-05 8:46 ` Harsh Prateek Bora
2026-04-30 5:49 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Implement compat CPU capability retrieval for KVM on PowerVM Amit Machhiwal
2026-05-05 9:25 ` Harsh Prateek Bora [this message]
2026-04-30 5:49 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Add support for compat CPU capabilities for KVM on PowerNV Amit Machhiwal
2026-05-05 9:49 ` Harsh Prateek Bora
2026-04-30 5:49 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: PPC: Document KVM_PPC_GET_COMPAT_CAPS ioctl Amit Machhiwal
2026-05-05 9:55 ` Harsh Prateek Bora
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52c78fd5-e987-4140-bb37-f358fc25c7e6@linux.ibm.com \
--to=harshpb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=amachhiw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox