From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261543AbVFGCcT (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2005 22:32:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261487AbVFGC32 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2005 22:29:28 -0400 Received: from webmail.topspin.com ([12.162.17.3]:26808 "EHLO exch-1.topspincom.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261454AbVFGC27 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2005 22:28:59 -0400 To: Greg KH Cc: "David S. Miller" , tom.l.nguyen@intel.com, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pci_enable_msi() for everyone? X-Message-Flag: Warning: May contain useful information References: <20050603224551.GA10014@kroah.com> <20050605.124612.63111065.davem@davemloft.net> <20050606225548.GA11184@suse.de> From: Roland Dreier Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 17:18:49 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20050606225548.GA11184@suse.de> (Greg KH's message of "Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:55:49 -0700") Message-ID: <52ekbfj9xy.fsf@topspin.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jun 2005 02:28:53.0996 (UTC) FILETIME=[A610DAC0:01C56B08] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg> That's fine to disable msi, I don't have an issue with that. Greg> I'm just getting pushback from some vendors as to why MSI Greg> isn't explicitly enabled by default and I don't have any Greg> solid answers. Why don't those vendors push back on their own behalf, on public mailing lists? - R.