public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	"Li, Xiaoyao" <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
	"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/4] x86/bus_lock: Handle warn and fatal in #DB for bus lock
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 21:51:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52f0c74cb1714a78bc84e158d26e7c38@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201109082958.GZ2594@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

Hi, Peter,

> On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 04:29:16AM +0000, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> > split_lock_detect=
> > 		#AC for split lock		#DB for bus lock
> >
> > off		Do nothing			Do nothing
> >
> > warn		Kernel OOPs			Warn once per task and
> > 		Warn once per task and		and continues to run.
> > 		disable future checking 	When both features are
> > 						supported, warn in #DB
> >
> > fatal		Kernel OOPs			Send SIGBUS to user
> > 		Send SIGBUS to user
> > 		When both features are
> > 		supported, fatal in #AC.
> 
> > +void handle_bus_lock(struct pt_regs *regs) {
> > +	if (!bld)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	pr_warn_ratelimited("#DB: %s/%d took a bus_lock trap at address:
> 0x%lx\n",
> > +			    current->comm, current->pid, regs->ip); }
> 
> So the Changelog above, and the state_show() below, seem to suggest there
> should be SIGBUS code in #DB, but I'm having trouble spotting it.

You are right. The SIGBUS is missing here. Somehow my tests didn't capture the issue.

I will add:
+		force_sig_fault(SIGBUS, BUS_ADRALN, NULL);
to send SIGBUS in fatal case for #DB bus lock.

Thank you very much for your review!

-Fenghua


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-10 21:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-08  4:29 [PATCH 0/4] x86/bus_lock: Enable bus lock detection Fenghua Yu
2020-11-08  4:29 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86/cpufeatures: Enumerate #DB for " Fenghua Yu
2020-11-08  4:29 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/bus_lock: Handle warn and fatal in #DB for bus lock Fenghua Yu
2020-11-09  8:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-10 21:51     ` Yu, Fenghua [this message]
2020-11-08  4:29 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86/bus_lock: Set rate limit " Fenghua Yu
2020-11-08  4:29 ` [PATCH 4/4] Documentation/admin-guide: Change doc for split_lock_detect parameter Fenghua Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52f0c74cb1714a78bc84e158d26e7c38@intel.com \
    --to=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox