From: Roland Dreier <roland@topspin.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4 use __dma_buffer in scsi.h
Date: 13 Jun 2002 10:42:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52fzzr2hzb.fsf@topspin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200206130218.g5D2Hx302994@localhost.localdomain>
>>>>> "James" == James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com> writes:
James> This is actually unnecessary. We've already had this
James> discussion on the parisc mailing lists (over a year ago, I
James> think).
Fair enough, the only reason I came up with this patch is that I
looked at all unaligned DMA done by USB, and
drivers/usb/storage/transport.c does DMA into sense_buffer.
James> The SCSI subsystem is designed with this type of cache
James> incoherency problem in mind. The Scsi_Cmnd structure has
James> an ownership model to forestall cache line bouncing. The
James> idea is that when you want to dma to/from components of a
James> Scsi_Cmnd, you can only do it when the ownership is
James> SCSI_OWNER_LOW_LEVEL, which guarantees that nothing in the
James> mid layer will touch the command and trigger an incoherency
James> (at least until it times out). The low level driver is
James> supposed to know about the cache incoherency problem, and
James> so avoids touching the structure between cache line
James> invalidation/writeback and DMA completion, thus, with a
James> correctly implemented driver, there should be no
James> possibility of DMA corruption.
Out of curiousity, how do you deal with someone writing to Scsi_Cmnd
_before_ the DMA and having that data lost when pci_map_single() with
PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE invalidates the cache before writeback?
Best,
Roland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-13 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-13 2:17 [PATCH] 2.4 use __dma_buffer in scsi.h James Bottomley
2002-06-13 17:42 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2002-06-13 17:52 ` James Bottomley
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-13 0:24 Roland Dreier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52fzzr2hzb.fsf@topspin.com \
--to=roland@topspin.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox