From: Roland Dreier <roland@topspin.com>
To: Vicente Feito <vicente.feito@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: workqueue - process context
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 20:57:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52is4ptae0.fsf@topspin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200502190148.11334.vicente.feito@gmail.com> (Vicente Feito's message of "Sat, 19 Feb 2005 01:48:11 +0000")
Vicente> I've been playing with workqueues, and I've found that
Vicente> once I unload the module, if I don't call
Vicente> destroy_workqueue(); then the workqueue I've created
Vicente> stays in the process list, [my_wq], I don't know if
Vicente> that's meant to be, or is it a bug, cause I believe there
Vicente> can be two options in here:
Vicente> 1) It's meant to be so you can unload your module and let
Vicente> the works run some time after you're already gone, that
Vicente> allows you to probe other modules or do whatever necesary
Vicente> without the need to wait for the workqueue to be emtpy.
Vicente> 2) It's a bug, cause the module allows to be unloaded,
Vicente> destroying the structs but not removing the workqueue
Vicente> from the process context.
Not destroying its workqueue is a bug in the module just like any
other resource leak. It's analogous to a module allocating some
memory with kmalloc() and not calling kfree() when it's unloaded. If
a module creates a workqueue, then it should call destroy_workqueue()
when it's unloaded.
By the way, the module (or any code calling destroy_workqueue()) must
make sure that it has race conditions that might result in work being
submitted to the queue while it is being destroyed.
-R .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-19 4:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-19 1:48 workqueue - process context Vicente Feito
2005-02-19 4:57 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2005-02-19 2:02 ` Vicente Feito
2005-02-19 5:03 ` Roland Dreier
2005-02-19 14:31 ` Rene Herman
2005-02-19 16:19 ` Roland Dreier
2005-02-19 16:52 ` Rene Herman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-19 2:38 Vicente Feito
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52is4ptae0.fsf@topspin.com \
--to=roland@topspin.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vicente.feito@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox