From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266731AbUGUUpD (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2004 16:45:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266732AbUGUUpD (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2004 16:45:03 -0400 Received: from umhlanga.stratnet.net ([12.162.17.40]:55422 "EHLO umhlanga.STRATNET.NET") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266731AbUGUUpA (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jul 2004 16:45:00 -0400 To: "David S. Miller" Cc: ultralinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix sparc64 build with CONFIG_COMPAT=n X-Message-Flag: Warning: May contain useful information References: <52fz808qwy.fsf@topspin.com> <20040720200352.5c17b3f7.davem@redhat.com> From: Roland Dreier Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 13:43:53 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20040720200352.5c17b3f7.davem@redhat.com> (David S. Miller's message of "Tue, 20 Jul 2004 20:03:52 -0700") Message-ID: <52llhd2ira.fsf@topspin.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jul 2004 20:43:53.0186 (UTC) FILETIME=[6F3BEC20:01C46F63] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David> I like the big fix, and it allowed some cleanups too. I've David> munged your patch a bit and this is what I'm currently David> testing. Cool, my allnoconfig compile tests thank you. Just out of curiousity, is there any practical use for sparc64 without CONFIG_COMPAT? My impression was that everyone used 32-bit userspace (except for possibly a few executables). - R.