public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland Dreier <roland@topspin.com>
To: tom.l.nguyen@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Question on using MSI in PCI driver
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 19:22:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52lligqqlc.fsf@topspin.com> (raw)

I'm looking at implementing MSI/MSI-X support in a PCI device driver
I'm working on.  However, I've run into an issue with the MSI API that
I would like some clarification on.

When I call pci_enable_msi, since my device is MSI-X capable, the
kernel calls msix_capability_init, which works out the memory region
where vectors should be written and then calls request_region.  (In
fact it calls

             request_mem_region(phys_addr,
		dev_msi_cap * PCI_MSIX_ENTRY_SIZE,
		"MSI-X iomap Failure"))

which leads to a bizarre entry in /proc/iomem with the name "MSI-X
iomap Failure")

The problem is that if I follow the standard route in my driver and
call pci_request_regions() during init (since I want to claim my whole
device), the request_mem_region in msix_capability_init will fail.
Now, for my device, the MSI-X table happens to fall in the middle of a
BAR, and I need to access stuff on both sides of it in that BAR.  To
make things even worse for me, my device has two more BARs I want to claim.

So it seems I am forced to turn my nice clean pci_request_regions()
call into two calls to request_mem_region() (to get the beginning and
end of the BAR with the MSI-X table in it) and two more calls to
pci_request_region() (to get the other two BARs).

This isn't the end of the world but it feels suboptimal to me.  Anyone
have an idea for a better way to do this?  (I'm happy to write a patch
to the kernel if someone suggests how to change the MSI API)

Thanks,
  Roland

             reply	other threads:[~2004-06-22  2:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-22  2:22 Roland Dreier [this message]
2004-06-22  3:50 ` Question on using MSI in PCI driver Jeff Garzik
2004-06-22  3:54   ` Roland Dreier
2004-06-22  4:01     ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-22  4:04       ` Roland Dreier
2004-06-22  4:03 ` [PATCH] Export msi_remove_pci_irq_vectors Roland Dreier
2004-06-22  4:35   ` [PATCH] Fix MSI-X setup Roland Dreier
2004-06-22 23:23     ` Greg KH
2004-06-22 23:57       ` Roland Dreier
2004-06-23  0:04         ` Greg KH
2004-06-22  8:45   ` [PATCH] Export msi_remove_pci_irq_vectors Christoph Hellwig
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-22 15:24 Question on using MSI in PCI driver Nguyen, Tom L
2004-06-22 17:49 ` Roland Dreier
2004-06-22 18:08 Nguyen, Tom L
2004-06-22 18:26 ` Roland Dreier
2004-06-22 19:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-06-22 19:55   ` Roland Dreier
2004-06-22 18:43 Nguyen, Tom L

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52lligqqlc.fsf@topspin.com \
    --to=roland@topspin.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tom.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox