From: Roland Dreier <roland@topspin.com>
To: fc scsi <scsi_fc_group@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: _PAGE_PCD bit in DMAable memory
Date: 16 May 2004 19:20:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52r7tjx09t.fsf@topspin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040517011257.86012.qmail@web50003.mail.yahoo.com>
fc> Hi, I am trying to get DMAable memory on i386
fc> (kmalloc(GFP_DMA,)) but seems _PAGE_PCD is not set on the
fc> pages that i get back the memory from. Am I getting the
fc> correct results? If yes, then is it not that GFP_DMA should
fc> give me non-cacheable memory (equivalent to setting _PAGE_PCD
fc> along with _PAGE_PWT on i386). Can anyone confirm for me that
fc> GFP_DMA will *always* give me non-cacheable and contiguous
fc> memory.
On i386, the GFP_DMA flag controls _where_ the memory will be
allocated, namely in the low 16 MB. This is really a relic of the
days of 24-bit ISA DMA.
On i386, the memory does not have to be non-cacheable, since in the PC
architecture the bus controller will maintain consistency by snooping
the CPU. However, to be portable, your code should use
pci_alloc_consistent() to get memory for DMAing. This will do the
right thing on all platforms, including making sure that the memory is
non-cacheable on architectures where the bus controller does not snoop.
(By the way, kmalloc() will always return contiguous memory, but you
should still use pci_alloc_consistent for DMA memory)
- Roland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-17 2:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-17 1:12 _PAGE_PCD bit in DMAable memory fc scsi
2004-05-17 2:20 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2004-05-17 15:48 ` fc scsi
[not found] <20040518190319.95305.qmail@web50004.mail.yahoo.com>
2004-05-18 20:29 ` Ingo Oeser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52r7tjx09t.fsf@topspin.com \
--to=roland@topspin.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scsi_fc_group@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox