From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262599AbVHDQGj (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 12:06:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262580AbVHDQGg (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 12:06:36 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]:42940 "EHLO sj-iport-5.cisco.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262599AbVHDQEp (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2005 12:04:45 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="3.95,167,1120460400"; d="scan'208"; a="202719411:sNHT31016898" To: torvalds@osdl.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org Subject: [git pull] REALLY final InfiniBand updates for 2.6.13 X-Message-Flag: Warning: May contain useful information From: Roland Dreier Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 09:04:28 -0700 Message-ID: <52vf2ladtf.fsf@cisco.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Aug 2005 16:04:29.0999 (UTC) FILETIME=[3227D3F0:01C5990E] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org There are two small last-minute fixes for InfiniBand I would like to get into 2.6.13: one to avoid pain in releasing 2.6.13 with an incorrect enum definition that we have to rename later, and one to fix RARP on IP-over-InfiniBand. If there's still time before 2.6.13, please pull from rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband.git for-linus The patches update the following files: include/ib_cm.h | 3 ++- ulp/ipoib/ipoib_main.c | 5 +++-- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) through the following changes: commit 0dca0f7bf82face7b700890318d5550fd542cabf Author: Hal Rosenstock Date: Thu Jul 28 13:17:26 2005 -0700 [PATCH] [IPoIB] Handle sending of unicast RARP responses RARP replies are another valid case where IPoIB may need to send a unicast packet with no neighbour structure. Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier commit 4e38d36d88ead4e56f3155573976da84d5df18b3 Author: Roland Dreier Date: Thu Jul 28 13:16:30 2005 -0700 [PATCH] [IB/cm]: Correct CM port redirect reject codes Reject code 24 is port and CM redirection, not just port redirection. Port redirection alone is code 25. Therefore we should rename code 24 to IB_CM_REJ_PORT_CM_REDIRECT and use IB_CM_REJ_PORT_REDIRECT for code 25. Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier Thanks, Roland