From: Christopher Heiny <cheiny@synaptics.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Duggan <aduggan@synaptics.com>,
Vincent Huang <vincent.huang@tw.synaptics.com>,
Vivian Ly <vly@synaptics.com>,
Daniel Rosenberg <daniel.rosenberg@synaptics.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@stericsson.com>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
Courtney Cavin <courtney.cavin@sonymobile.com>,
Linux Input <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - do not update configuration in rmi_f01_probe()
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:32:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5303D185.8020302@synaptics.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140217192321.GC19223@core.coreip.homeip.net>
On 02/17/2014 11:23 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 03:00:43PM -0800, Christopher Heiny wrote:
>> On 02/13/2014 01:54 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 11:23:44AM -0800, Christopher Heiny wrote:
>>>>> On 02/12/2014 09:27 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>>>>>> Do not write configuration data in probe(), we have config() for that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then we should call config() in rmi_function_probe() to ensure that
>>>>> any platform data or device tree configuration settings get written
>>>>> to the device.
>>>
>>> Well, yes, we may elect to update device configuration in probe, but
>>> then we should not be doing that 2nd time in ->config(). We shoudl pick
>>> either one or another.
>>
>> But as the code currently stands, config() is only called when a
>> device reset is detected, not during initialization. So if there's
>> platform specific configuration data that needs to be written to a
>> function, it won't get written until after a device reset occurs,
>> which might never happen. So either we need to write that data (or
>> call config()) in each function's probe(), or in
>> rmi_function_probe().
>
> Ah, I missed the fact that we do not normally call ->config() unless
> device was reset. BTW, if device was reset, shouldn't we tear down
> everything and then reenumerate all functions?
That's only required if the reset is a result of the device being
reflashed. Since we're dropping support for user-space control of
reflash, and will instead use an in-driver reflash, we know which resets
are the result of a reflash and which aren't. The reflash code will do
the following sequence:
- tell the core to tear down the functions
- perform the reflash operation
- reset the device
- tell the core to re-enumerate the functions
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-18 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-13 5:27 [PATCH 01/11] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - do not kfree() managed memory in F01 Dmitry Torokhov
2014-02-13 5:27 ` [PATCH 02/11] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - remove unused rmi_f01_remove() Dmitry Torokhov
2014-02-13 19:11 ` Christopher Heiny
2014-02-13 5:27 ` [PATCH 03/11] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - do not update configuration in rmi_f01_probe() Dmitry Torokhov
2014-02-13 19:23 ` Christopher Heiny
2014-02-13 21:54 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-02-14 23:00 ` Christopher Heiny
2014-02-17 19:23 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-02-18 21:32 ` Christopher Heiny [this message]
2014-03-19 0:21 ` Christopher Heiny
2014-02-13 5:27 ` [PATCH 04/11] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - fix LTS handling in F01 Dmitry Torokhov
2014-02-13 19:32 ` Christopher Heiny
2014-02-14 8:05 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-02-13 5:27 ` [PATCH 05/11] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - remove control_mutex from f01_data Dmitry Torokhov
2014-02-13 23:01 ` Christopher Heiny
2014-02-13 5:27 ` [PATCH 06/11] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - remove device_status form f01_data Dmitry Torokhov
2014-02-13 21:15 ` Christopher Heiny
2014-02-13 5:27 ` [PATCH 07/11] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - rename instances of f01_data from data to f01 Dmitry Torokhov
2014-02-13 21:32 ` Christopher Heiny
2014-02-13 5:27 ` [PATCH 08/11] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - use rmi_read/rmi_write in F01 Dmitry Torokhov
2014-02-13 21:33 ` Christopher Heiny
2014-02-13 5:27 ` [PATCH 09/11] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - consolidate memory allocations " Dmitry Torokhov
2014-02-13 19:52 ` Christopher Heiny
2014-02-13 5:27 ` [PATCH 10/11] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - make accessor for platform data return const pointer Dmitry Torokhov
2014-02-13 20:00 ` Christopher Heiny
2014-02-13 5:27 ` [PATCH 11/11] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - remove data pointer from RMI fucntion structure Dmitry Torokhov
2014-02-13 21:33 ` Christopher Heiny
2014-02-13 19:11 ` [PATCH 01/11] Input: synaptics-rmi4 - do not kfree() managed memory in F01 Christopher Heiny
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5303D185.8020302@synaptics.com \
--to=cheiny@synaptics.com \
--cc=aduggan@synaptics.com \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=courtney.cavin@sonymobile.com \
--cc=daniel.rosenberg@synaptics.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@stericsson.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.huang@tw.synaptics.com \
--cc=vly@synaptics.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).