From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devel@acpica.org
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch v1 2/6] ACPI: rename acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost to acpi_evaluate_ost for reuse
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 13:46:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5304453F.1050104@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6382282.2gCVKeUJUt@vostro.rjw.lan>
Hi Rafael,
We have following code to deal with existing users.
+#ifdef ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST
+#define acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost acpi_evaluate_ost
+#else
+static inline acpi_status
acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost(acpi_handle handle, u32 source_event,
- u32 status_code, struct acpi_buffer *status_buf);
+ u32 status_code, struct acpi_buffer *status_buf)
+{ return AE_OK; }
+#endif
Thanks!
On 2014/2/18 9:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, February 17, 2014 01:02:49 PM Jiang Liu wrote:
>> Rename acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost() to acpi_evaluate_ost() for later resue.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/utils.c | 14 ++++----------
>> include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 10 +++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
>> index 85e3b61..19d0169 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/utils.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
>> @@ -433,17 +433,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_get_physical_device_location);
>> * When the platform does not support _OST, this function has no effect.
>> */
>> acpi_status
>> -acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost(acpi_handle handle, u32 source_event,
>> - u32 status_code, struct acpi_buffer *status_buf)
>
> There are users of this, what about updating them?
>
>> +acpi_evaluate_ost(acpi_handle handle, u32 source_event, u32 status_code,
>> + struct acpi_buffer *status_buf)
>> {
>> -#ifdef ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST
>> union acpi_object params[3] = {
>> {.type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER,},
>> {.type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER,},
>> {.type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER,}
>> };
>> struct acpi_object_list arg_list = {3, params};
>> - acpi_status status;
>>
>> params[0].integer.value = source_event;
>> params[1].integer.value = status_code;
>> @@ -455,13 +453,9 @@ acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost(acpi_handle handle, u32 source_event,
>> params[2].buffer.length = 0;
>> }
>>
>> - status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_OST", &arg_list, NULL);
>> - return status;
>> -#else
>> - return AE_OK;
>> -#endif
>> + return acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_OST", &arg_list, NULL);
>> }
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost);
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_evaluate_ost);
>>
>> /**
>> * acpi_handle_printk: Print message with ACPI prefix and object path
>> diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
>> index 8256eb4..adef502 100644
>> --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
>> +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
>> @@ -49,8 +49,16 @@ acpi_evaluate_reference(acpi_handle handle,
>> struct acpi_object_list *arguments,
>> struct acpi_handle_list *list);
>> acpi_status
>> +acpi_evaluate_ost(acpi_handle handle, u32 source_event, u32 status_code,
>> + struct acpi_buffer *status_buf);
>> +#ifdef ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST
>> +#define acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost acpi_evaluate_ost
>> +#else
>> +static inline acpi_status
>> acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost(acpi_handle handle, u32 source_event,
>> - u32 status_code, struct acpi_buffer *status_buf);
>> + u32 status_code, struct acpi_buffer *status_buf)
>> +{ return AE_OK; }
>> +#endif
>>
>> acpi_status
>> acpi_get_physical_device_location(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_pld_info **pld);
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-19 5:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-17 5:01 [RFC Patch v1 0/6] Miscellaneous improvements for ACPI Jiang Liu
2014-02-17 5:02 ` [RFC Patch v1 1/6] acpi_pad: simplify notify handler by using acpi_drv_ops->notify Jiang Liu
2014-02-17 5:02 ` [RFC Patch v1 2/6] ACPI: rename acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost to acpi_evaluate_ost for reuse Jiang Liu
2014-02-18 1:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-02-19 5:46 ` Jiang Liu [this message]
2014-02-19 15:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-02-17 5:02 ` [RFC Patch v1 3/6] acpi_pad: use acpi_evaluate_pad() to replace open-coded version Jiang Liu
2014-02-18 1:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-02-19 5:57 ` Jiang Liu
2014-02-17 5:02 ` [RFC Patch v1 4/6] xen, " Jiang Liu
2014-02-17 5:02 ` [RFC Patch v1 5/6] acpi_processor: " Jiang Liu
2014-02-17 5:02 ` [RFC Patch v1 6/6] ACPI: use device name LNXSYBUS.xx for ACPI \_SB and \_TZ objects Jiang Liu
2014-02-18 1:06 ` [RFC Patch v1 1/6] acpi_pad: simplify notify handler by using acpi_drv_ops->notify Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-02-19 5:45 ` Jiang Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5304453F.1050104@linux.intel.com \
--to=jiang.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=devel@acpica.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox