From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/opregion: work around buggy firmware that provides 8+ output devices
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:59:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5304725A.3020909@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140219073339.GA30685@srcf.ucam.org>
On 02/19/2014 03:33 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:31:29PM +0800, Aaron Lu wrote:
>
>> DID2 is in system memory region and has some assigned value like 0x400
>> when we read it. For this case it is easy since there is only one output
>> device that is of type LVDS so we can match it to connector of type eDP
>> or LVDS, suppose there is only one such connector. But for output
>> devices' whose _ADR has the value of 0x301, 0x302, etc. I have no idea
>> how to match them up to the connectors of that type as we can't be sure
>> the probe order we have used in i915 driver is the same as BIOS'.
>
> Non-standard _ADR values are assigend by the GPU vendor, so Intel should
> be able to provide you with the correct interpretations.
It doesn't seem the _ADR value has to be the format defined by _DOD, as
the example of the ACPI spec gives:
Method (_ADR, 0) {
return(0x0100)
}
So that is not the problem here.
The problem is, we don't have any way of matching an ACPI output device
node to a drm connector of the same type when there are more than 1 of
those with the same type, i.e. we don't know how the index value are
assigned by BIOS.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-19 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-12 3:05 [PATCH] drm/i915/opregion: work around buggy firmware that provides 8+ output devices Aaron Lu
2014-02-12 10:31 ` Chris Wilson
2014-02-12 10:52 ` Jani Nikula
2014-02-13 9:10 ` Aaron Lu
2014-02-13 10:08 ` Chris Wilson
2014-02-13 12:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-02-19 7:31 ` Aaron Lu
2014-02-19 7:33 ` Matthew Garrett
2014-02-19 8:59 ` Aaron Lu [this message]
2014-03-04 14:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-12-08 1:58 ` Aaron Lu
2014-12-08 11:00 ` Jani Nikula
2014-12-08 11:04 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2014-12-09 9:15 ` Aaron Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5304725A.3020909@intel.com \
--to=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rempel-privat.de \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).