From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753857AbaBSOMP (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:12:15 -0500 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:36684 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753837AbaBSOMN (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:12:13 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,505,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="484058745" Message-ID: <5304BBB9.9010205@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 22:12:09 +0800 From: Jiang Liu Organization: Intel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maarten Lankhorst , David Airlie , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Dave Airlie , Emil Velikov CC: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] nouveau, ACPI: fix regression caused by b072e53 References: <1392785628-30633-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> <5304838B.4040500@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: <5304838B.4040500@canonical.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2014/2/19 18:12, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > op 19-02-14 05:53, Jiang Liu schreef: >> On some platforms, ACPI _DSM method (nouveau_op_dsm_muid, function 0) >> has special requirements on the fourth parameter, which is different >> from ACPI specifications. So revert to the private implementation >> to check availability of _DSM functions instead of using common >> acpi_check_dsm() interface. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu >> --- >> Hi Maarten, >> Thanks for bisecting. Could you please help to verify whether >> this patch fixes the regression? >> > Tested-by: Maarten Lankhorst > > I was wrong about the operator precedence, seems correct after all. :-) Hi Maarten, Thanks for testing. Cheers! Gerry