From: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Chris Boot <bootc@bootc.net>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] firewire: don't use PREPARE_DELAYED_WORK
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 20:44:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5306AF8E.3080006@hurleysoftware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1392929071-16555-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
On 02/20/2014 03:44 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> PREPARE_[DELAYED_]WORK() are being phased out. They have few users
> and a nasty surprise in terms of reentrancy guarantee as workqueue
> considers work items to be different if they don't have the same work
> function.
>
> firewire core-device and sbp2 have been been multiplexing work items
> with multiple work functions. Introduce fw_device_workfn() and
> sbp2_lu_workfn() which invoke fw_device->workfn and
> sbp2_logical_unit->workfn respectively and always use the two
> functions as the work functions and update the users to set the
> ->workfn fields instead of overriding work functions using
> PREPARE_DELAYED_WORK().
>
> It would probably be best to route this with other related updates
> through the workqueue tree.
>
> Compile tested.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
> Cc: linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Chris Boot <bootc@bootc.net>
> Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: target-devel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> drivers/firewire/core-device.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/firewire/sbp2.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> include/linux/firewire.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firewire/core-device.c b/drivers/firewire/core-device.c
> index de4aa40..2c6d5e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/firewire/core-device.c
> +++ b/drivers/firewire/core-device.c
> @@ -916,7 +916,7 @@ static int lookup_existing_device(struct device *dev, void *data)
> old->config_rom_retries = 0;
> fw_notice(card, "rediscovered device %s\n", dev_name(dev));
>
> - PREPARE_DELAYED_WORK(&old->work, fw_device_update);
> + old->workfn = fw_device_update;
> fw_schedule_device_work(old, 0);
>
> if (current_node == card->root_node)
> @@ -1075,7 +1075,7 @@ static void fw_device_init(struct work_struct *work)
> if (atomic_cmpxchg(&device->state,
> FW_DEVICE_INITIALIZING,
> FW_DEVICE_RUNNING) == FW_DEVICE_GONE) {
> - PREPARE_DELAYED_WORK(&device->work, fw_device_shutdown);
> + device->workfn = fw_device_shutdown;
> fw_schedule_device_work(device, SHUTDOWN_DELAY);
Implied mb of test_and_set_bit() in queue_work_on() ensures that the
newly assigned work function is visible on all cpus before evaluating
whether or not the work can be queued.
Ok.
> } else {
> fw_notice(card, "created device %s: GUID %08x%08x, S%d00\n",
> @@ -1196,13 +1196,20 @@ static void fw_device_refresh(struct work_struct *work)
> dev_name(&device->device), fw_rcode_string(ret));
> gone:
> atomic_set(&device->state, FW_DEVICE_GONE);
> - PREPARE_DELAYED_WORK(&device->work, fw_device_shutdown);
> + device->workfn = fw_device_shutdown;
> fw_schedule_device_work(device, SHUTDOWN_DELAY);
> out:
> if (node_id == card->root_node->node_id)
> fw_schedule_bm_work(card, 0);
> }
>
> +static void fw_device_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct fw_device *device = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
> + struct fw_device, work);
I think this needs an smp_rmb() here.
> + device->workfn(work);
> +}
> +
Otherwise this cpu could speculatively load workfn before
set_work_pool_and_clear_pending(), which means that the old workfn
could have been loaded but PENDING was still set and caused queue_work_on()
to reject the work as already pending.
Result: the new work function never runs.
But this exposes a more general problem that I believe workqueue should
prevent; speculated loads and stores in the work item function should be
prevented from occurring before clearing PENDING in
set_work_pool_and_clear_pending().
IOW, the beginning of the work function should act like a barrier in
the same way that queue_work_on() (et. al.) already does.
Regards,
Peter Hurley
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-21 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-20 20:44 [PATCHSET wq/for-3.15] workqueue: remove PREPARE_[DELAYED_]WORK() Tejun Heo
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 1/9] wireless/rt2x00: don't use PREPARE_WORK in rt2800usb.c Tejun Heo
2014-03-07 15:26 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 2/9] ps3-vuart: don't use PREPARE_WORK Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 23:19 ` Geoff Levand
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 3/9] floppy: don't use PREPARE_[DELAYED_]WORK Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 9:37 ` Jiri Kosina
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 4/9] firewire: don't use PREPARE_DELAYED_WORK Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 1:44 ` Peter Hurley [this message]
2014-02-21 1:59 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 2:07 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-21 2:13 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 5:13 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-21 10:03 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 12:51 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-21 13:06 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 16:53 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-21 16:57 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 23:01 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-21 23:18 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 23:46 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-22 14:38 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-22 14:48 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-22 18:43 ` James Bottomley
2014-02-22 18:48 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-22 18:52 ` James Bottomley
2014-02-22 19:03 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-23 1:23 ` memory-barriers.txt again (was Re: [PATCH 4/9] firewire: don't use PREPARE_DELAYED_WORK) Stefan Richter
2014-02-23 16:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-23 20:35 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-23 23:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-24 0:09 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-24 16:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-24 0:32 ` Stefan Richter
2014-02-24 16:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-23 20:05 ` [PATCH 4/9] firewire: don't use PREPARE_DELAYED_WORK James Bottomley
2014-02-23 22:32 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-21 20:45 ` Stefan Richter
2014-03-05 21:34 ` Stefan Richter
2014-03-07 15:18 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-07 15:26 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 5/9] usb: " Tejun Heo
2014-02-20 20:59 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-02-21 15:06 ` Alan Stern
2014-02-21 15:07 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-22 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2014-02-22 15:14 ` Alan Stern
2014-02-22 15:20 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-22 15:37 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-22 23:03 ` Alan Stern
2014-02-23 4:29 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 6/9] nvme: don't use PREPARE_WORK Tejun Heo
2014-03-07 15:26 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 7/9] afs: " Tejun Heo
2014-02-20 22:00 ` David Howells
2014-02-20 22:46 ` Tejun Heo
2014-03-07 15:27 ` Tejun Heo
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 8/9] staging/fwserial: " Tejun Heo
2014-02-21 15:13 ` Peter Hurley
2014-02-20 20:44 ` [PATCH 9/9] workqueue: remove PREPARE_[DELAYED_]WORK() Tejun Heo
2014-03-07 15:27 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5306AF8E.3080006@hurleysoftware.com \
--to=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=bootc@bootc.net \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox