From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: Markus Mayer <markus.mayer@linaro.org>, Matt Porter <mporter@linaro.org>
Cc: Christian Daudt <bcm@fixthebug.org>,
ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: bcm2835: Move to mach-bcm directory
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:48:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53079173.3030305@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPdLdqmX7xYwHse4y9+2_-491pw0ODcjxou6_ZC9=aoiR72-MQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/21/2014 10:41 AM, Markus Mayer wrote:
> On 21 February 2014 06:09, Matt Porter <mporter@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 09:53:56PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 02/20/2014 05:16 PM, Markus Mayer wrote:
>>>> Move the bcm2835 board file into the mach-bcm directory. This allows us
>>>> to get rid of the mach-bcm2835 directory with the associated Kconfig
>>>> and Makefile.
>>>
>>> This looks fine, although it needs a small patch to bcm2835_defconfig
>>> squashed in, which I'll post in a second.
>>>
>>> Do you want me to take it through the bcm2835 tree? That's probably
>>> easiest to avoid conflicts with any other bcm2835 patches, not that it's
>>> too likely there will be any to the board file.
>>
>> That's ok with me. Be aware that we may have minor Kconfig/Makefile
>> conflicts between the bcm2835 tree and the mach-bcm tree since we just
>> queued the bcm5301x support.
>
> Matt, will you squash Stephen's patch into mine when you take the
> patches or should I submit a v2 of the patch that combines both?
I think Matt said it was OK to take them through the bcm2835 tree. I'll
squash them together; no need to repost.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-21 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-21 0:16 [PATCH] ARM: bcm2835: Move to mach-bcm directory Markus Mayer
2014-02-21 4:53 ` Stephen Warren
2014-02-21 14:09 ` Matt Porter
2014-02-21 17:41 ` Markus Mayer
2014-02-21 17:48 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2014-02-21 17:50 ` Matt Porter
2014-02-25 2:49 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53079173.3030305@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=bcm@fixthebug.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markus.mayer@linaro.org \
--cc=mporter@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox