From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755029AbaBUTR4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:17:56 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:57663 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752273AbaBUTRy (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:17:54 -0500 Message-ID: <5307A651.5030604@zytor.com> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:17:37 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Beulich CC: davem@davemloft.net, Ingo Molnar , tglx@linutronix.de, dborkman@redhat.com, ffusco@redhat.com, tgraf@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/hash: fix build failure with older binutils References: <53073962020000780011E2DE@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <68ae560f-8cf7-4083-816f-3fa78aed9a87@email.android.com> <53076DBC020000780011E552@nat28.tlf.novell.com> In-Reply-To: <53076DBC020000780011E552@nat28.tlf.novell.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/21/2014 06:16 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 21.02.14 at 13:51, "H. Peter Anvin" wrote: >> How old? > > 2.16.91.0.5 (SLE10) > I would *love* to kill off binutils 2.16. It was a horribly buggy version, and it has been hard to deal with keeping things alive with it. How important is this? Since this is the first I've heard of this being broken, I am kind of encouraged that maybe we can move on? -hpa